Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Vail, 274 N.W.2d 127.

65 citing documents.

Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of S.G. 390 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of S.G. 390 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of L.R.B. 373 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.R.B. 373 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hanson 364 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1985
State v. Hanson 364 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1985
In Re the Welfare of V.R. 355 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of V.R. 355 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Wiley 348 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Wiley 348 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Buchholtz 295 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1980
State v. Buchholtz 295 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1980
has no application to the facts of this case.
State v. Vernon 283 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1979
State v. Vernon 283 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1979
The regulation bears a “rational relationship to a permissible state objective” so there is no denial of equal protection of the law, or of due process of law.