DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 266 N.W.2d 706.

67 citing documents.

  • State v. Smith 448 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Smith 448 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    6, 1985) (finding factual basis for guilty plea where victim lost a tooth); (sufficient evidence of “other serious bodily harm” where victim was unconcious for one day and hospitalized for one week); (supreme court stated in dicta that “[ajrguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly”).
  • State v. Lande 376 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Anderson 370 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Anderson 370 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    the supreme court held there was sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict that the defendant had inflicted “great bodily harm,” where the complainant was found unconscious, remained in the hospital a week, and suffered numbness, dizziness and headaches.
  • State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Stafford 340 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Stafford 340 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Motl 337 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Motl 337 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Eilola 289 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Eilola 289 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
    Defendant’s in which we discuss the relevant principles in detail.
  • State v. Juelfs 270 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Juelfs 270 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1978
    Because of these possibilities, we cannot accept defendant’s contention that the jury’s verdict means it rejected Ms. Johnson’s testimony.” See, also