Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808.

576 citing documents.

Campion v. County of Wright 347 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
On appeal, the court makes “an independent examination of [the county’s] record and decision.” ().
Wenzel v. Meeker County Welfare Board 346 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wenzel v. Meeker County Welfare Board 346 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
As a general rule courts defer to an agency’s interpretation when the language subject to construction is so technical in nature that only a specialized agency has the experience and expertise needed to understand it, when the language is ambiguous or when the agency interpretation is one of long standing.
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
We also agree that deference is to be shown to agency expertise, “restricting judicial functions to a narrow area of responsibility, lest [the court] substitute its judgment for that of the agency.”
STATE BY GOMEZ-BETHKE v. Eastern Air Lines 346 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
STATE BY GOMEZ-BETHKE v. Eastern Air Lines 346 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
*186 The test for determining whether a
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 344 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1984
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
We have held that upon appeal, “decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education and experience.”
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 344 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1984
-25 (Minn.1977); State ex rel.
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 342 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1983
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 342 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1983
We have defined the “substantial evidence” test as a quantitative evidentiary test requiring “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
City of Minneapolis v. Church Universal & Triumphant 339 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1983
City of Minneapolis v. Church Universal & Triumphant 339 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1983
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 325 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1982
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 325 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1982
Western Area Business & Civic Club v. Duluth School Board Independent District No. 709 324 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1982
Western Area Business & Civic Club v. Duluth School Board Independent District No. 709 324 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1982
Fisher Nut Co. v. Lewis Ex Rel. Garcia 320 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1982
Fisher Nut Co. v. Lewis Ex Rel. Garcia 320 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1982
Taylor v. Beltrami Electric Cooperative, Inc. 319 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1982
Taylor v. Beltrami Electric Cooperative, Inc. 319 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1982
the court approved the following definition of substantial evidence: We view that by the “substantial evidence” test is meant: 1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; 2) more than a scintilla of evidence; 3) more than “some evidence”; 4) more t
Honn v. City of Coon Rapids 313 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1981
Honn v. City of Coon Rapids 313 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1981
for review of state agency decisions was appropriate in reviewing the decisions of local governing bodies in zoning matters.
Minnesota Chemical Dependency Ass'n v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 310 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1981
Tamarac Inn, Inc. v. City of Long Lake 310 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1981
Minnesota Chemical Dependency Ass'n v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 310 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1981
Tamarac Inn, Inc. v. City of Long Lake 310 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1981
In prior decisions we made it clear that “special deference” need not be given to trial court review of agency action, (emphasis added), but instead, this court must “independently [examine] the action of the local governing body to determine its propriety,”
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture 310 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1981
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture 310 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1981
Resident v. Noot 305 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1981
Resident v. Noot 305 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1981
As a general rule, this court defers to an agency’s interpretation when the language subject to construction is so technical in nature that only a specialized agency has the experience and expertise needed to understand it, when the language is ambiguous or when the agency interpretation is one of long standing.
Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593 304 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1981
Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593 304 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1981
-33 (Minn.1980); -24 (Minn.1977).
Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 300 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1980
Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 300 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1980
In light of these *777 provisions, and giving the agency judgment the weight to which it is entitled, we conclude that the DNR has met its burden under § 105.405, subd.
In Re the Alteration of the Outlet Elevation of Plum Grove Lake 297 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1980
In Re the Alteration of the Outlet Elevation of Plum Grove Lake 297 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1980
Independent School District No. 277 v. Pautz 295 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1980
Independent School District No. 277 v. Pautz 295 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1980
Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. State 297 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1980
Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. State 297 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1980
Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 295 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1980
Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 289 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1980
Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 289 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1980
Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co. 288 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1980
Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co. 288 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1980
Floodwood-Fine Lakes Citizens Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 287 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
Floodwood-Fine Lakes Citizens Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 287 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
The scope of review of an agency decision by the trial court has been fully discussed in two recent decisions, and No Power Line

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by