Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808.

576 citing documents.

In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the City of Redwood Falls 756 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the City of Redwood Falls 756 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Agency decisions “enjoy a presumption of correctness.”
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of Commissioners 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
Card v. KANDIYOHI CTY. BD. OF COM'RS 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of Commissioners 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
Card v. KANDIYOHI CTY. BD. OF COM'RS 713 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2006
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. City of St. Paul Park 711 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. City of St. Paul Park 711 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Matter of Hildebrandt 701 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Matter of Hildebrandt 701 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Commissioner of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 696 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Commissioner of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 696 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Berne Area Alliance for Quality Living v. Dodge County Board of Commissioners 694 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Berne Area Alliance for Quality Living v. Dodge County Board of Commissioners 694 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Our review of an agency’s consideration of environmental factors is limited, and we will intervene only when the record suggests “the agency has not taken a ‘hard look’ at the salient problems” and its decision lacks “articulated standards and reflective findings.” White v. Minn. Dep’t of Natural Res., , 730 (Minn.App.1997) (), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
tal concept that decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience.” In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, ().
Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 683 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2004
Aaa Striping v. Mn. Dot 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
AAA Striping Service Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Aaa Striping v. Mn. Dot 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
AAA Striping Service Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Substantial evidence means: “(1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.”
In the Matter of Petition of N. St. Power 676 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In the Matter of Petition of N. St. Power 676 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 674 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Anderson v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCES 674 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Anderson v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCES 674 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 674 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician 674 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the City of Owatonna's NPDES/SDS Proposed Permit Reissuance 672 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2004