Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808.

576 citing documents.

Department of Human Rights Ex Rel. Cooper v. Spiten 424 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(“decisions of administrative agencies enjoy a presumption of correctness”).
Luther Haven Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 425 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Luther Haven Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 425 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The agency’s decision is accorded a “presumption of correctness.”
Deerson v. Metal-Matic, Inc. 423 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Deerson v. Metal-Matic, Inc. 423 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services 422 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human Services 422 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
§ 14.69 (1986); -27 (Minn.1977).
Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Commerce 422 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Commerce 422 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility 421 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility 421 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Swanson v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1988
Swanson v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1988
We said, , (Minn.1977), “[I]t is our function to make an independent examination of an administrative agency’s record and decision and arrive at our own conclusions as to the propriety of that determination without according any special deference to the same review conducted by the trial court.” Id.
In Re the Deregulation of the Installation & Maintenance of Inside Wiring 420 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Deregulation of the Installation & Maintenance of Inside Wiring 420 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 419 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 419 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Agency decisions “enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by the courts to the agency’s expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education and experience.”
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 417 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 417 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re the Disciplinary Action Against Wang 417 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Disciplinary Action Against Wang 417 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“Substantial evidence” has been defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kollmorgen v. State Board of Medical Examiners 416 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kollmorgen v. State Board of Medical Examiners 416 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 416 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1987
we defined "substantial evidence” as: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.
Matter of Schroeder 415 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Schroeder 415 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Miltona State Bank 414 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pawelk v. Camden Township 415 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Miltona State Bank 414 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(agency order entitled to a presumption of validity unless and until it is overturned by the reviewing courts).
Pawelk v. Camden Township 415 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
C & C Teletronics, Inc. v. U.S. West Information Systems, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
C & C Teletronics, Inc. v. U.S. West Information Systems, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Franco v. Ramsey County Community Human Services 413 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Franco v. Ramsey County Community Human Services 413 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Where the district court is acting in an appellate capacity with respect to administrative agencies, this court on appeal makes an independent examination of the agency’s record and decision and arrives at its own conclusions as to the propriety of that determination, “without according any special deference to the same review conducted by the trial court.”
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 413 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co. 413 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The fundamental concept underlying judicial review is that the agency decisions “enjoy a presumption of correctness, and deference should be shown by courts to the agencies’ expertise and their special knowledge in the field of their technical training, education, and experience.”
In re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n 410 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n 410 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
An agency’s construction of its own statutes enjoys a presumption of correctness, due to the agency’s presumed expertise, knowledge, training, education and experience, nevertheless, deference need not be paid where, as here, there are compelling indications that the agency’s interpretation is wrong.
Lewis v. Minneapolis Board of Education, Special School District 1 408 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lewis v. Minneapolis Board of Education, Special School District 1 408 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n 408 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n 408 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Brooks v. RAMSEY CTY. COMM. HUMAN SERV. 405 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1987