Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Larson, 281 N.W.2d 481.

100 citing documents.

Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
A prima facie case of juror misconduct is established by submitting "sufficient evidence which, standing alone and unchallenged, would warrant the conclusion of jury misconduct.” cert.
State v. Church 577 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1998
State v. Church 577 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1998
Although Schwartz hearings are to be liberally granted, a defendant must establish a prima facie ease presenting “sufficient evidence which, standing alone and unchallenged, would warrant the conclusion of jury misconduct.”
State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
-83 (Minn.1984); cert, denied, 444 U.S. 973 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
State v. Starkey 516 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1994
Before a Schwartz hearing must be ordered, the defendant must establish a pri-ma facie case of jury misconduct, evidence which “standing alone and unchallenged, would warrant the conclusion of jury misconduct.” cert.
State v. Jolley 508 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1993
State v. Jolley 508 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1993
Moreover, , 486 including at n. 4 (Minn.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 973 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hunt v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 460 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990
State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
Appellant also alleges the trial court improperly denied a jury instruction he requested, -87 (Minn.1979), that a mental illness may be proven despite the temporary nature of that illness in a particular case.
Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad 441 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad 441 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
To establish a prima facie case for a Schwartz hearing, the mov-ant “must submit sufficient evidence which, standing alone and unchallenged, would warrant the conclusion of jury misconduct.” cert.
State v. Mosley 414 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Mosley 414 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Rainer 411 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1987
State v. Rainer 411 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1987
State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kerkhoff v. Kerkhoff 400 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kerkhoff v. Kerkhoff 400 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Knaak 396 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Knaak 396 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Aligah v. State 394 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Aligah v. State 394 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
A jury “is free to accept part and reject part of a witness’ testimony.” ().
State v. Benedict 393 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Benedict 393 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985
State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985
State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
In insanity defense cases, we have held that “[sjubstantial deference is accorded the jury’s evaluation of the testimony on mental illness, and we have often said that the jury is the sole judge of the believability and weight of the testimony.”
State v. LaTourelle 343 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1984
State v. LaTourelle 343 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1984
In State v. Wendler, 312 Minn. 432 , we made clear that Rawland only meant that the jury could hear evidence of cognition, volition, and capacity to control behavior; it did not alter the standard for a legal finding of insanity.
State v. Carlson 328 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1982
State v. Carlson 328 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1982
State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
See, e. g., State v. Hoskins, 292 Minn. 111, 137-38
State v. Scheerle 285 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1979
State v. Scheerle 285 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1979