Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co., 268 N.W.2d 892.

39 citing documents.

Kelly Michels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
605, 606 (Minn. 1929); (requiring that a party asserting that a district court erred by allowing leading questions show a “clear abuse of discretion” and clearly show specific prejudice).
Nicholas Houchins, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Penney Co., see Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R.
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Huber v. Niagara MacH. and Tool Works 430 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1988
Huber v. Niagara MacH. and Tool Works 430 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1988
Penney Co., -15 (Minn.1982) (Simonett, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Krein v. Raudabough 406 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Krein v. Raudabough 406 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Penney Co., ), but to establish the claim, the manufacturer’s failure to warn must be the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury.
Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co. 395 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1986
Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co. 395 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1986
Penney Co., Clark v. Rental Equipment Co., 300 Minn. 420 , McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., 278 Minn. 322 , Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co., 248 Minn. 319 , 79 *
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maanum v. Aust 364 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Maanum v. Aust 364 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Penney Co., Moteberg v. Johnson, 297 Minn. 28, 34
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Penney Co., (“Minnesota courts repeatedly have held suppliers of products liable for negligence for products which are not in themselves defective in the sense of being flawed, but which are rendered dangerous by lack of instructions or warnings”).
Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Penney Co., (jury’s verdict consistent where it found seller of flammable clothing *285 negligent but not strictly liable where there was evidence of defective clothing and of failure to warn users of potential hazards.)
Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc. 346 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1984
Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc. 346 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1984
Penney Co., however, the same type of verdict was upheld on appeal because the jury instructions given rendered negligence the broader theory of recovery.
Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc. 324 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1982
Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc. 324 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1982
Penney Co., we approved the Eighth Circuit’s analysis of Halvorson found in Bjerk v. Universal Engineering Corp., 552 F.2d 1314 (8th Cir.1977).
Griffiths v. Lovelette Transfer Co., Inc. 313 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1981
Griffiths v. Lovelette Transfer Co., Inc. 313 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1981
See Wegscheider v. Plastics, Inc.
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
“[T]he primary responsibility for the reduction of excessive damages lies in the trial court, and * * * a trial court’s ruling on this point will only be disturbed where a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated.”
Leskey v. Heath Engineering Co. 293 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1980
Leskey v. Heath Engineering Co. 293 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1980
but that the award of medical and hospital expenses was improper.
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe 291 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1980
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe 291 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1980
Nelson v. Nelson 283 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1979
Nelson v. Nelson 283 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1979