Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of Afton, 268 N.W.2d 712.

83 citing documents.

SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See, e.g., Hubbard Broadcasting, d at 762-63 (holding inconsistency with plan based on “intention to preserve and enhance the low-density residential-agricultural character of the community and its scenic beauty” a legally sufficient reason to deny permit); -18 (Minn.1978) (upholding denial of special use permit because plan was “permeated with evidence of a strong desire to preserve the rural character and unique scenic beauty”).
Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners 495 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners 495 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
BBY INVESTORS v. City of Maplewood 467 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
BBY INVESTORS v. City of Maplewood 467 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Smith v. City of Owatonna 439 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Smith v. City of Owatonna 439 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Barton Contracting Co., -716 (Minn.1978).
Application of Christenson 417 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1987
Application of Christenson 417 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1987
The rule is that “the requirements of due process must be measured according to the nature of the government function involved and whether or not interests are directly affected by the government action.” Barton Contracting Company, Inc., v. City of Afton
Chase v. City of Minneapolis 401 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Chase v. City of Minneapolis 401 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(comprehensive plan sufficient basis for conditional use permit’s denial when proposed gravel mining use would not allow later planned residential end use).
State v. Guminga 395 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1986
State v. Guminga 395 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1986
1367 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961); Barton Contracting Co., (“[T]he requirements of due process must be measured according to the nature of the government function involved and whether or not private interests are directly affected by the government action.”); W. LaFave & A. Scott, Handbook on Criminal Law § 20 (1972).
Amoco Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 395 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Amoco Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 395 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Barton Contracting Co. v. *119 City of Afton
William v. City of Ham Lake 393 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
William v. City of Ham Lake 393 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(mere community opposition is a legally insufficient reason).
Larson v. County of Washington 387 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Larson v. County of Washington 387 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hubbard Broadcasting, (citing Barton Contracting Co., ).
Prior Lake Aggregates, Inc. v. City of Savage 349 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Prior Lake Aggregates, Inc. v. City of Savage 349 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights 336 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1983
VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights 336 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1983
See Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 196 , Barton Contracting Co.
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of Afton 323 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1982
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of Afton 323 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1982
C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of Shoreview 304 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1981
C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of Shoreview 304 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1981
Barton Contracting Co. Inc., v. City of Afton
Luger v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1980
Luger v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1980
A year earlier, in Barton Contracting Co., we upheld a city council’s denial of a special use permit, finding some of the reasons noted by the city council valid and sufficient to justify that denial.
Northwestern College v. City of Arden Hills 281 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1979
Northwestern College v. City of Arden Hills 281 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1979
See, also, in which we independently examined the action of the local governing body to determine its propriety, rather than merely reviewing the decision of the district court for clear error.
Kletschka v. Le Sueur County Board of Commissioners 277 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1979
Kletschka v. Le Sueur County Board of Commissioners 277 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1979
Our recent decision in Barton Contracting Co., controls disposition of this case.