Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haglund, 267 N.W.2d 503.
-
State v. Stanifer
382 N.W.2d 213
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(prosecution’s unintentional reference to defendant’s prior sojourn at St.
- State v. True 378 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. True 378 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Stephani 369 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Stephani 369 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Farr 357 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Farr 357 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Hjerstrom 287 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Hjerstrom
287 N.W.2d 625
Minn. 1979
in which the defendant on appeal claimed that he was prejudiced by the testimonial summary of an intercepted inculpatory note he wrote which included the statement that he did not want to be “sent to St.