Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Blue Earth v. Stauffenberg, 264 N.W.2d 647.

35 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert Reiland, Below, Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P., successor … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert Reiland, Below, Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P., successor … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The condemning authority need not make a “showing of absolute or indispensable necessity.” (quotation omitted).
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The condemning authority need only show that the proposed taking is reasonably necessary or convenient for furtherance of the end in view.” (quotations omitted); (stating that taking needs to be only reasonably necessary or convenient for furtherance of end in view).
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Fridley v. Main Street Fridley Properties, LLC 755 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Fridley v. Main Street Fridley Properties, LLC 755 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 641 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2002
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 641 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 2002
-50 (Minn.1978) (stating that although a taking may be completed by the time the necessity of the governmental taking is finally reviewed by this court, the governmental body that took the property can be compelled to return it to its previous owner); (holdi
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 630 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in & for Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. 630 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Such a -50 (Minn.1978) (allowing interlocutory appeal of a district court order finding the existence of public necessity).
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(if a court fails to find adequate public purpose and necessity to support a condemnation, the governmental body which took the disputed property could be compelled to return it to the previous owner).
City of Duluth v. Stephenson 481 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
City of Duluth v. Stephenson 481 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
City of Eagan v. O'NEIL 437 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
City of Eagan v. O'NEIL 437 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis v. Carl Bolander & Sons Property 436 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis v. Carl Bolander & Sons Property 436 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(proper appeal from final certificate filed with county recorder after entry of final judgment); State v. Wren, Inc., 275 Minn. 259, 262 , (appeal from final judgment, not order granting condemnation petition); Town of Lebanon v. Land Holding Co., 274 Minn. 558, 559 , 143 N.
City of Duluth v. State 390 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1986
City of Duluth v. State 390 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1986
City of New Ulm v. Schultz 356 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of New Ulm v. Schultz 356 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137
State Ex Rel. Waste Management Board v. Bruesehoff 343 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State Ex Rel. Waste Management Board v. Bruesehoff 343 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of Mankato v. Hilgers 313 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1981
City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 303 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 303 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
Alexandria Lake Area Service Region v. Johnson 295 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1980
Alexandria Lake Area Service Region v. Johnson 295 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1980
in support of this proposition.
City of New Prague, County of Scoot v. Hendricks 286 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1979
City of New Prague, County of Scoot v. Hendricks 286 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1979
: “Although lands may not be taken by eminent domain unless such taking appears to be necessary, it is well settled in this jurisdiction that there need be no showing of absolute or indispensable necessity, but only that the proposed taking is reasonably necessary or convenient for the furtherance of the en
Cooperative Power Ass'n v. Eaton 284 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1979
Cooperative Power Ass'n v. Eaton 284 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1979
this court acknowledged that a proposed taking is necessary within the meaning of § 117.075 if it is “reasonably necessary or convenient” to attain the desired goal.