Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Elliott v. Elliott, 274 N.W.2d 75.

30 citing documents.

Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
at 754-56 (noting supreme court’s forecast Janssen’s holding, even before the definition of marital property in Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Neubauer v. Neubauer 433 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Neubauer v. Neubauer 433 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Indeed, a case decided a decade after the dissolution in this matter.
Marriage of Kruschel v. Kruschel 419 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Kruschel v. Kruschel 419 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(pension rights are to be considered as property rights and social security benefits as income in determining property division and alimony); pet.
Marriage of Crace v. Crace 396 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Crace v. Crace 396 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Janssen followed a series of cases finding both private and public pension benefits to be marital property, (private pension benefits are property for purposes of distribution under Minn.Stat.
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
evidence was presented at trial establishing that the husband’s social security base was high enough to ensure maximum payments if he waited until retirement to claim them.
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke 353 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke 353 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen 331 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1983
Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen 331 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1983
This result — finding a property, interest in a nonvested pension — -
Marriage of Taylor v. Taylor 329 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1983
Marriage of Taylor v. Taylor 329 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1983
Faus v. Faus 319 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1982
Faus v. Faus 319 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1982
Melamed v. Melamed 286 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1979
Melamed v. Melamed 286 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1979
Hagerty v. Hagerty 281 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1979
Hagerty v. Hagerty 281 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1979
Jensen v. Jensen 276 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1979
Jensen v. Jensen 276 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1979
we specifically held that pension benefits are property to be considered by the court in exercising its discretion in a property division or award of alimony.