Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., 281 N.W.2d 838.

53 citing documents.

Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
The court of appeals noted that it was not inferring indemnity in violation of the holding of Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc. , , 842 (Minn. 1979), superseded by statute on other grounds , Minn. Stat. § 337.02 (2017).
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., (holding that obligation to indemnify “will not be found by implication”).
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
While Bolduc also relies on Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., that case was decided five years before chapter 337 went into effect.
Allen v. Burnet Realty, LLC 801 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2011
Allen v. Burnet Realty, LLC 801 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2011
The court also concluded the LA Program did not fall within our characterization of insurance as a contract providing indemnification for “losses with which the indemnitor had no connection and over which it had no control.” Anstine v. Lake Darling Ranch, 305 Minn. 243, 251 , overruled on other grounds by Farmington Plumbing &amp
Zutz v. Nelson 788 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2010
Zutz v. Nelson 788 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2010
We have said that “judgment on the pleadings is proper where the defendant relies on an affirmative defense or counterclaim which does not raise material issues of fact.” Jacobson v. Rauenhorst Corp., 301 Minn. 202, 206 , overruled on other grounds by Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.
Seward Housing Corp. v. Conroy Bros. Co. 573 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1998
Seward Housing Corp. v. Conroy Bros. Co. 573 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1998
See Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.
Lake Cable Partners v. Interstate Power Co. 563 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lake Cable Partners v. Interstate Power Co. 563 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Katzner, d at 382 (ambiguity in an indemnity contract is resolved against the drafter); Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., (“Indemnity agreements are to be strictly construed when the indemnitee * * * seeks to be indemnified for its own negligence.”).
Katzner v. Kelleher Construction 545 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1996
Katzner v. Kelleher Construction 545 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1996
Co., -88 (Minn.1980); Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.
National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 529 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1995
National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 529 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1995
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson Motors 514 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson Motors 514 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
“Indemnity agreements are to be strictly construed when the indemnitee seeks to be indemnified for its own negligence.” (citing Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., ), pet.
National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 507 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
National Hydro Systems v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 507 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.
IOWA NAT. MUT. INS. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. 464 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
IOWA NAT. MUT. INS. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. 464 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
During the pre-trial period, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
During the pre-trial period, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Apache Plaza, Ltd. v. Midwest Savings Ass'n 456 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bogatzki v. Hoffman 430 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bogatzki v. Hoffman 430 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 390 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 390 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Fossum v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. 372 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fossum v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Co. 372 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Farmington Plumbing and Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc., Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Otis Elevator Co. v. Don Stodola's Well Drilling Co. 372 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Otis Elevator Co. v. Don Stodola's Well Drilling Co. 372 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Mattila v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT CO. 363 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Mattila v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT CO. 363 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer *54 Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1982
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1982
Thus, we held in Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., that indemnity clauses were to be strictly construed against the purported indemnitee, and that indemnity will not be created by implication.
R. E. M. IV, Inc. v. Robert F. Ackermann & Associates, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1981
R. E. M. IV, Inc. v. Robert F. Ackermann & Associates, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1981
The strict construction rule for interpreting indemnity agreements was adopted in Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc., : Indemnity agreements are to be strictly construed when the indemnitee * * * seeks to be indemnified for its own negligence.
Solidification, Inc. v. Minter 305 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1981
Solidification, Inc. v. Minter 305 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1981
we have held that indemnity clauses are to be strictly construed.
Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1980
Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1980
Our holding is in accord with the principle that parties who settle litigation are favored in the law, Esser v. Brophey, 212 Minn. 194 , and that “each tortfeasor accept responsibility for damages commensurate with its own relative culpability,” Farmington Plumbing and Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand and Aggregate, Inc.
Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 294 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1980

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by