Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Petition of Linehan, 280 N.W.2d 29.

35 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of L.A.F. 546 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(court declined to terminate father’s parental rights when his “derelictions” were due, in part, to mother’s actions); Staat, 287 Minn. at 506 , d at 713 (separation of child and parent due to “misfortune” does not constitute abandonment).
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
Matter of Welfare of Sn 423 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Welfare of Sn 423 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Welfare of D.I. 413 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.I. 413 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In this court rejected the use of that standard.
Matter of Welfare of DDK 376 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of DDK 376 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(termination sought for adoption by stepfather); (stepfather’s petition for termination).
Petition of MG 375 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Petition of MG 375 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 374 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 374 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Indeed, in and the court held that sporadic visitation by itself would not support termination of a parent’s rights; rather, a court must look to whether this inability to care properly for the child will continue indefinitely.
Matter of Welfare of Maas 355 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of Maas 355 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of HGB 306 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1981
Matter of Welfare of HGB 306 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1981
In this court rejected the use of the best interest of the child standard in termination of parental rights proceedings.
Matter of Welfare of Gillispie 296 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Gillispie 296 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of J. W. M. 290 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of J. W. M. 290 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Solomon 291 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Solomon 291 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1980
(parental rights of natural father not terminated, and custody remained unchanged with natural mother and stepfather).
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
2 In the case of this court held that the test for determining whether parental rights should be terminated is whether the parent is “presently able to assume his responsibilities and not whether he has from time to time in the past been derelict in his duties.” This test suggests that the relevant time period include