Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. State, 279 N.W.2d 360.

44 citing documents.

In Re the Rate Appeal of Benedictine Health Center 728 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2007
In Re the Rate Appeal of Benedictine Health Center 728 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2007
Home, (quoting Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, ).
Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 591 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 591 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
of Educ., (quoting Minnesotar-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, ).
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, -46 (Minn.App.1989) (“The scope of review in a pre-enforcement challenge to a rule is more restrictive than review of an agency’s decision in a contested enforcement proceeding.”).
Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Minnesota State Board of Education 499 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Minnesota State Board of Education 499 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The scope of review is limited, however, Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, and is confined to the record.
Application of Q Petroleum 498 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Application of Q Petroleum 498 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., (quoting Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardward Ass’n v. State, ).
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 486 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1992
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 486 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1992
Id.; see Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 469 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 469 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“Interpretative rules” are “promulgated to make specific the law enforced or administered by the agency.” Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, (footnote omit *722 ted).
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 469 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 469 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, (comparing Reserve Mining Co. v. Minn. P.C.A., 294 Minn. 300 , ); see also Minn. Ass’n of Homes for the Aging v. Dep’t of Human Serv., pet.
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 467 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota League of Credit Unions v. Minnesota Department of Commerce 467 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State
Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 447 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 447 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State
Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 433 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 433 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“An agency interpretation that ‘make[s] specific the law enforced or administered by the agency’ is an interpretive rule that is valid only if promulgated in accordance with the [Minnesota Administrative Procedure] Act.” Mapleton Community Home, (); see also Minn.Stat.
Vang v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Vang v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Interpretative rules are promulgated to “make specific the law enforced or administered by the agency,” while legislative rules are promulgated “pursuant to delegated powers to make substantive law, and, in contrast to interpretative rules, have the force and effect of law.” -65 (Minn.1979) (footnote omitted).
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe 410 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe 410 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’
Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 391 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1986
Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 391 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1986
Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’
Minnesota Ass'n of Homes for the Aging v. Department of Human Services 385 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Minnesota Ass'n of Homes for the Aging v. Department of Human Services 385 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*68 Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State
Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 375 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 375 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Contested Case of Mapleton Community Home, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Contested Case of Mapleton Community Home, Inc. 373 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Interpretative rules are those which “make specific the law enforced or administered by the agency.” Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’
Benson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Benson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
In Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass’n v. State, we contrasted judicial review in a contested, enforcement proceeding with a pre-en-forcement rule challenge.