Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environ…, 266 N.W.2d 858.

55 citing documents.

A24-0958 A24-0959 A24-0960 A24-0976 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(PEER), (recognizing “general policy of statutory construction followed by this court of harmonizing statutes dealing with the same subject matter”); cf. State ex rel.
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(PEER), Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council, ).
A19-0118 A19-0124 A20-1271 A20-1380 A20-1385 Minn. 2023
” we have “allowed persons seeking judicial review of agency decision- making to ‘make inquiry through discovery to determine whether the agency adhered to statutorily defined procedures or the rules and regulations promulgated by the agency itself which enter into the fundamental decision-making process.’ ” People for Env’t Enlightenment & Resp., (PEER), Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council, (quoting Mampel v. E. Heights State Bank of St.
Klingelhutz Judgment, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Quality Council, there is no reason to consider the judgment lien statute when the relief requested does not include enforcement of a lien.
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, et al., Minn. 2021
(PEER), Inc. v. Minn. Env’t Quality Council (PEER), d 858, 865, 868 (Minn. 1978).
White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. 928 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Application of Gourley Brothers, LLC for a Water Appropriation Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Application of Gourley Brothers, LLC for a Water Appropriation Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Quality Council, d 858, 871 (Minn. 1978).
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 799 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 799 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Quality Council, (harmonizing MERA with Power Plant Siting Act).
State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 771 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 771 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Quality Council, (stating that “[o]nce a person or a group has made a prima facie showing that an agency’s action or inaction will materially adversely affect protectible natural resources,” the agency must rebut the prima facie case) (emphasis added).
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
Carter v. Olmsted County Housing 574 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Carter v. Olmsted County Housing 574 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER)
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
Quality Council, (recognizing that this court has previously “[f]ollow[ed] the lead of Michigan” in interpreting MERA)).
Dorn v. Peterson 512 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dorn v. Peterson 512 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Quality Council, (court presumes lawmaking body acts with full knowledge of existing law on the same subject and that new statutes will harmonize, not conflict, with existing laws).
State Ex. Rel. Wacouta Township v. Brunkow Hardwood Corp. 510 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State Ex. Rel. Wacouta Township v. Brunkow Hardwood Corp. 510 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
Quality Council, , 868 n. 13 (Minn.1978).
Krmpotich v. City of Duluth 483 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1992
Krmpotich v. City of Duluth 483 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1992
The trial court in considering an Environmental Rights Act claim must, of course, follow the steps outlined in County of Freeborn v. Bryson, 297 Minn. 218
In Re Combined Air & Solid Waste Permit No. 2211-91-OT-1 for the Dakota County Mixed Municipal Solid Waste … 483 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Combined Air & Solid Waste Permit No. 2211-91-OT-1 for the Dakota County Mixed Municipal Solid Waste … 483 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
In re American Republic Insurance Company's Forms A-1598, 1-1941, A-2523MN, A-2718MN, A-2745MN, A-2673MN, A-2663MN, A-2645MN, A-2484MN, A-2485MN, A-2481MN, … 427 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re American Republic Insurance Company's Forms A-1598, 1-1941, A-2523MN, A-2718MN, A-2745MN, A-2673MN, A-2663MN, A-2645MN, A-2484MN, A-2485MN, A-2481MN, … 427 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility, Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District, 278 Minn. 1, 11
In re the Miltona State Bank 414 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Miltona State Bank 414 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc., 254 Minn. 62, 73-74 , (in determining legislative intent^ court is to read the statute as a whole and to interpret various provisions of the same statute in light of each other); (Minnesota Supreme Court follows a policy of harmonizing statutes dealing with the same subject matter).
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe 396 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe 396 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
regarding Commerce Commissioner limited to written interrogatories); People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility (PEER), (reaffirming Mampel and holding Minnesota Environmental Quality Council members could only be required to answer written interrogatories).
Kensinger v. Kippen 390 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kensinger v. Kippen 390 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We must presume the legislature knew of the court’s construction of § 541.07(1), see People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility (PEER), and we must assume the legislature approved of it because the legislature has not amended § 541.07(1) in a manner inconsistent with the judicial construction
Omegon, Inc. v. City of Minnetonka 346 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Omegon, Inc. v. City of Minnetonka 346 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
See, e.g., People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility (PEER)
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 342 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1983
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 342 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1983
People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility, see also Morey v. School Board of Independent School District No. 492, 271 Minn. 445, 448-50 , -08 (1965).
In Re Estate of Eriksen 337 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983
In Re Estate of Eriksen 337 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983
People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility (PEER)
Kilowatt Organization (TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & Development 336 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1983
Kilowatt Organization (TKO), Inc. v. Department of Energy, Planning & Development 336 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1983
See People for Environmental Enlightenment and Responsibility (PEER)
State ex rel. Citizens Against Power Plant Pollution, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board 305 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1981