Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Buettner v. City of St. Cloud, 277 N.W.2d 199.

56 citing documents.

James M. Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Cloud, d 199, 201 (Minn. 1979).
Roger Aspengren, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
David Thompson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Cloud , d 199, 201 ( Minn. 1979).
First Baptist Church of St. Paul, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Janet M. Bauch, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Gust G. Johanson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
Cloud, (“A special assessment is a tax, intended to offset the cost of local improvements .
DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cloud, (concluding that the district court went “one step too far in ordering a reduction of the assessment rather than” ordering a reassessment).
Fred E. Friedrichs v. Lake Washington Sanitary District Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Fred E. Friedrichs v. Lake Washington Sanitary District Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cloud, (stating with regard to the special-benefit presumption, “[a] presumption makes a prima facie case which is dispositive in the absence of evidence; it disappears when adverse evidence on the question of value is introduced”); see also American Bank of St.
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cloud, and, on appeal, we therefore conduct “a careful examination of the record to ascertain whether the evidence as a whole fairly supports the findings of the district court and whether these in turn support its conclusions of law and judgment.” Carlson-Lang, 307 Minn. at 373, d at 521.
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 868 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2015
Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 868 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2015
Prior Lake Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Prior Lake Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cloud, further clarifies that the de novo reference in Ewert refers to the district court’s determination of a factual issue, and not the appellate standard of review.
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Coop v. County of Renville 737 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 2007
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Coop v. County of Renville 737 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 2007
Cloud, (construing "presumption of validity" as operating the same as "a prima facie case”).
David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of Winona 686 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of Winona 686 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee 610 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee 610 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. City of Eagan 584 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1998
Johnson v. City of Eagan 584 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1998
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 569 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 569 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Blankenburg v. City of Northfield 462 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Blankenburg v. City of Northfield 462 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schumacher v. City of Excelsior 427 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
Schumacher v. City of Excelsior 427 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake 414 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake 414 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Independent School District 254 v. City of Kenyon 411 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Independent School District 254 v. City of Kenyon 411 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter 398 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter 398 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Special Assessment for Maplewood Public Project No. 78-10 v. City of Maplewood 358 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Special Assessment for Maplewood Public Project No. 78-10 v. City of Maplewood 358 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mohwinkel v. City of North St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mohwinkel v. City of North St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lydon v. City of North St. Paul 355 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lydon v. City of North St. Paul 355 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cloud, the Supreme Court held that a special assessment which exceeds the benefit to the property, as measured by the difference in market value before and after the improvement, is a taking under the Fourteenth Amendment: [I]n a case such as this, where the sole issue presented is whether there has been an unco
Peterson v. City of Elk River 312 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1981
Peterson v. City of Elk River 312 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1981
Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980
Explained Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980