Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Colby v. Gibbons, 276 N.W.2d 170.

36 citing documents.

Corey Smith, a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Michael L. Weiner v. Sea Life Minnesota, … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court has held that “evidence as to similar accidents suffered by others under similar circumstances at times not too remote from the accident involved in the litigation is admissible to show the dangerous character of the place of injury or that defendant had 15 notice or knowledge of the dangers attendant upon the maintenance of the place of injury.” (quotation omitted).
Jacquelyn Bliss v. Central States Insulation Wholesale, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that to preserve an objection to jury instructions for appellate review, a party must object before the jury retires).
State v. Schulz 691 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 2005
State v. Schulz 691 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 2005
954 , 67 L.Ed.2d 119 (1981) (holding that rulings under rule 403 are committed to the sound discretion of the district court); ; 175 (Minn.1979), reh’g denied (Minn. Mar.
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Bauer 512 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Bauer 512 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mertes v. Estate of King 501 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Mertes v. Estate of King 501 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(rulings on admissibility of evidence within trial court’s discretion).
Lim v. Interstate System Steel Division, Inc. 435 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Lim v. Interstate System Steel Division, Inc. 435 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Determinations as to the admissibility of evidence are left to the discretion of the trial court, and we see no abuse of discretion in admitting the evidence.
Carlson v. County of Hennepin 428 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Carlson v. County of Hennepin 428 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gunhus, Grinnell v. Engelstad 413 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gunhus, Grinnell v. Engelstad 413 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Byman 410 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bahl v. Country Club Market, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Byman 410 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Renne v. Gustafson, 292 Minn. 218, 223
Bahl v. Country Club Market, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The trial court’s determination controls “unless practical justice requires otherwise.” (quoting Hiedeman v. Hiedeman, 290 Minn. 210, 217 , ).
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rulings on the admissibility of evidence are left to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its determination controls “unless practical justice requires otherwise.” quoting Hiedeman v. Hiedeman, 290 Minn. 210, 217
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
that objections to jury instructions not made prior to jury sequestration could not be heard on review.
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
However, “[rjulings on the admissibility of evidence are left to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its determination controls ‘unless practical justice requires otherwise.’” (citations omitted).
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 361 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 361 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Conservatorship of Torres 357 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1984
Matter of Conservatorship of Torres 357 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1984
Brandenberg v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Brandenberg v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
in support of her position.
Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co. 335 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1983
Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co. 335 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1983
See, e.g., Hiedeman v. Hiedeman, 290 Minn. 210