Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 270 N.W.2d 111.

110 citing documents.

Holbrook v. State Gambling Control Board 532 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Holbrook v. State Gambling Control Board 532 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Scott 530 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Scott 530 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of Woollett 527 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Commissioner's Order Denying Permit Application 93-1024 527 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re the Commissioner's Order Denying Permit Application 93-1024 527 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of Woollett 527 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Fedorko v. State, Commissioner of Human Services 525 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Fedorko v. State, Commissioner of Human Services 525 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Application of Burlington Northern R. Co. 522 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Application of Burlington Northern R. Co. 522 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ojala v. St. Louis County 522 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ojala v. St. Louis County 522 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Olson v. Chippewa County Social Services 515 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Olson v. Chippewa County Social Services 515 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
INTERN. ASS'N OF FIREFIGHTERS v. Plymouth 513 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
INTERN. ASS'N OF FIREFIGHTERS v. Plymouth 513 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services 494 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services 494 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., (agency’s interpretation may be entitled to some weight where statutory language is technical in nature and agency’s interpretation is one of long-standing application).
Winberg v. University of Minnesota 485 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Winberg v. University of Minnesota 485 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., Henry v. Metropolitan Waste Control Comm’n, (Minn.App.
Matter of Dougherty 482 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Dougherty 482 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of People's Cooperative Power … 470 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Electrical Contractor License of Kantrud 465 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Electrical Contractor License of Kantrud 465 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
When statutory interpretation is at issue this court is not bound by agency determination, but may give some weight to the determination “where (1) the statutory language is technical in nature, and (2) the agency’s interpretation is one of longstanding application.”
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Although an agency’s decision is entitled to some deference where statutory language is technical and the agency has applied a longstanding interpretation, when an agency’s authority to act is called into question, this court may independently review the enabling statute; we need not defer to agency expertise.
In re an Investigation of Unfair Election Practice Objections 451 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re an Investigation of Unfair Election Practice Objections 451 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport 444 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport 444 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
see also Petition of Fritz Trucking, Inc., pet.
Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co. 431 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co. 431 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Murphy Motor Freight Lines 428 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Murphy Motor Freight Lines 428 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 420 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 420 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Fritz Trucking, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Fritz Trucking, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Henry v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 401 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Henry v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 401 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security 386 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1986
Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security 386 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1986
While we will give deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute in certain cases, Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service Commission, 291 Minn. 241, 245 , we are not bound by its interpretation.