Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 274 N.W.2d 911.

34 citing documents.

Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Born v. Medico Life Insurance Co. 428 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Born v. Medico Life Insurance Co. 428 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bregier v. National Family Insurance Co. 411 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bregier v. National Family Insurance Co. 411 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Krein v. Raudabough 406 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Krein v. Raudabough 406 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Eystad v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Eystad v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mattson v. Rochester Silo, Inc. 397 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mattson v. Rochester Silo, Inc. 397 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 399 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 399 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
ANALYSIS On appeal from a jury verdict, all evidence must be considered “in the light most favorable to the prevailing party,” and “the verdict must be sustained unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.”
Larson v. Moorhead Country Club 395 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Larson v. Moorhead Country Club 395 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The verdict must be upheld “unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” (citation omitted).
Alholm v. Wilt 380 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 380 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Benson v. Rostad 384 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Benson v. Rostad 384 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fehling v. Levitan 382 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hagen 382 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hagen 382 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fehling v. Levitan 382 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(quoting Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , ).
Cal-Tank, Inc. v. Interco, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cal-Tank, Inc. v. Interco, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Troupe v. Sunrise Electric, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Troupe v. Sunrise Electric, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
On appeal from a jury verdict, all evidence must be considered “in the light most favorable to the prevailing party,” and “the verdict must be sustained unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.”
American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co. 353 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co. 353 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , -99 (1954) (footnotes omitted)
Orman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 296 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1980
Orman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 296 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1980