Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co., 284 N.W.2d 813.
- Limmer v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
- Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff 485 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1992
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1991
-
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
475 N.W.2d 73
Minn. 1991
Co., appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Roering v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 444 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1989
-
Roering v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
444 N.W.2d 829
Minn. 1989
Co., (minor injured while a passenger on an uninsured motorcycle).
- Thorp v. Price Bros. Co. 441 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel 439 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel
439 N.W.2d 755
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
at 644 ( aff'd on rehearing, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Wondra v. American Family Insurance Group 432 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1987
-
Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
417 N.W.2d 94
Minn. 1987
2 “was never intended to apply to uninsured motorist coverage.”
- Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1985
-
Beukhof v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.
371 N.W.2d 538
Minn. 1985
aff'd on rehearing, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Ballanger v. Toenjes 362 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Ballanger v. Toenjes
362 N.W.2d 2
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Kostrzewski v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Kostrzewski v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.
364 N.W.2d 910
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
aff'd on rehearing, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Wills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Wills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Andros v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 359 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Andros v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
359 N.W.2d 46
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the court held that an amendment was a clarification because the title specified that the act clarified certain ambiguous provisions in the Minnesota no-fault automobile insurance act.
- Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Beukhof v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
-
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
346 N.W.2d 627
Minn. 1984
Respondent Burgraff, on the other hand, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Randall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 335 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1983
-
Randall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
335 N.W.2d 247
Minn. 1983
affd on rehearing, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Flanery v. Total Tree, Inc. 332 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1983
-
Flanery v. Total Tree, Inc.
332 N.W.2d 642
Minn. 1983
In analyzing the incorporation of uninsured coverage into the No-Fault Act, aff’d on rehearing, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela 327 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
-
American Motorist Insurance Co. v. Sarvela
327 N.W.2d 77
Minn. 1982
aff’d on rehearing, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1062 , 100 S.Ct.
- Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 307 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1981
- Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 307 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1981
- Haugen v. Town of Waltham 292 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
-
Haugen v. Town of Waltham
292 N.W.2d 737
Minn. 1980
Co., that the 1977 amendments to the no-fault statute were merely clarifying amendments which “added nothing to change the law.” 1 d at 817 .
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. 288 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1980
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. 288 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1980