Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., 278 N.W.2d 81.

238 citing documents.

Whipple v. Independent School District No. 621 424 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gendreau v. Foremost Insurance Co. 423 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gendreau v. Foremost Insurance Co. 423 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
Whipple v. Independent School District No. 621 424 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Swenson 414 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Swenson 414 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates
Claybourne v. Imsland 414 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Claybourne v. Imsland 414 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Scholberg 412 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Best Maid Cookie Co. v. Flour Pot Cookie Co. 412 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Scholberg 412 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
Minnesota Best Maid Cookie Co. v. Flour Pot Cookie Co. 412 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
b) Extension of the Temporary Injunction Beyond the Term of the Non-compete Agreement In addition to its complaints regarding insufficient findings, Flour Pot contends the ruling in Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., supports its position for an extension of the injunction.
Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis 412 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis 412 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The party seeking the injunction must also show that it is needed to prevent “great and irreparable injury.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates
Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743 411 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743 411 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The party seeking a temporary injunction must show it lacks an adequate remedy at law and that interim relief is needed to prevent “great and irreparable injury.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates
Crown Holding Corp. v. Larson 410 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Nathanson 410 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Crown Holding Corp. v. Larson 410 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates
Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Nathanson 410 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Cherne Industries, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, (protected matter must not be readily ascertainable).
Alexander v. Severson 408 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Alexander v. Severson 408 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Injunctive Relief A trial court may exercise its sound discretion in granting injunctive relief and “its action will not be disturbed on appeal unless, based upon the whole record, it appears that there has been an abuse of such discretion.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., (citing AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 504 , ).
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Itasca Co. 403 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Creative Communications Consultants, Inc. v. Gaylord 403 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Itasca Co. 403 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The moving party must show that its legal remedies are inadequate and that “the injunction is necessary to prevent great and irreparable injury.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
Creative Communications Consultants, Inc. v. Gaylord 403 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Cherne Industrial Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., see also Eutectic Welding Alloys Corp. v. West, 281 Minn. 13 , 16 n. 4, , 569 n. 4 (1968) ("an inherent threat of irreparable injury may be inferred from the breach of an otherwise valid and enforceable restrictive covenant [not to compete or not to disclose trade secrets], sufficient t
Northwest Petroleum Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Economic Security 402 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northwest Petroleum Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Economic Security 402 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
A trial court may exercise sound discretion in granting injunctive relief and “its action will not be disturbed on appeal unless, based upon the whole record, it appears that there has been an abuse of such discretion.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., (citing AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc., 260 Minn. 499, 504 , ).
Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., (injunctive relief is available if damages are inadequate and injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable injury).
Oleisky v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n Minneapolis 398 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Oleisky v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n Minneapolis 398 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Material Movers, Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds Associates, Inc.
Satellite Industries, Inc. v. Keeling 396 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Satellite Industries, Inc. v. Keeling 396 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates
STATE EX REL. NEIGHBORS ORG., ETC. v. Dotty 396 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
STATE EX REL. NEIGHBORS ORG., ETC. v. Dotty 396 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
First National Bank of Shakopee v. Halo Investments 394 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
First National Bank of Shakopee v. Halo Investments 394 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
Winnick v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 389 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Winnick v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 389 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Che rne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
Carlen v. Klammer 388 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Carlen v. Klammer 388 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates *794 Inc.
Hideaway, Inc. v. Gambit Investments, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hideaway, Inc. v. Gambit Investments, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
County of Wright v. Litfin 386 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
County of Wright v. Litfin 386 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In seeking an injunction the County must establish that the applicable legal remedy is inadequate, and that the injunction is necessary to prevent “great and irreparable injury.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
World Wide Tracers, Inc. v. Metropolitan Protection, Inc. 384 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1986
World Wide Tracers, Inc. v. Metropolitan Protection, Inc. 384 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1986
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
Howe v. Howe 384 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Howe v. Howe 384 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The party seeking an injunction must establish that the applicable legal remedy is inadequate, and that the injunction is necessary to prevent “great and irreparable injury.” Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.