Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co., 268 N.W.2d 913.

88 citing documents.

Holzemer v. MILLERS'MUT. INS. CO. OF ILL. 359 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Holzemer v. MILLERS'MUT. INS. CO. OF ILL. 359 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1984
Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1984
we determined that section 65B.44 did not preclude stacking economic-loss benefits.
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 349 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., Comment, Stacking of Basic Economic Loss Benefits Under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, 5 Wm.
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 346 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1984
Co., we denied no-fault PIP benefits because of the policy definition of insured.
Wakefield v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 344 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1984
Wakefield v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 344 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1984
Relying, however, the plaintiff contends that the payment of separate premiums for the no-fault benefits applicable with respect to each vehicle described in the corporation’s insurance policy warrants stacking of those coverages.
Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 337 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1983
Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 337 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1983
Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 335 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1983
Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 335 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1983
we recognized that one of the prerequisites to stacking of basic economic loss benefits is that “the injured person must be an insured under two or more policies of no-fault insurance applicable on the same priority level * * we held that “the injured person shall be allowed to recover basic economic loss benefits under each no-fault coverage applicable to him as an insured to the extent of actual losses * * and we also said, id.
Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1983
Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1983
Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance 320 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1982
Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance 320 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1982
which “contains two important qualifiers that reflect the justifications for stacking.” Koons, d at 553 .
Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. 315 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1982
Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. 315 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1982
we held that stacking of total funeral expense benefits payable under section 65B.44 through two or more applicable coverages was not legislatively prohibited.
Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 302 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1981
Weiss v. Farmers Insurance Group 302 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
Weiss v. Farmers Insurance Group 302 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 302 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1981
Co., we interpreted our no-fault act, Minn.Stat.
Koons v. National Family Insurance Co. 301 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1981
Koons v. National Family Insurance Co. 301 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1981
discussed in Comment, Stacking of Basic Economic Loss Benefits Under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, 5 Wm.
Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co. 302 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1980
Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co. 302 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1980
Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 295 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1980
Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 295 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1980
Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co. 290 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1980
Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co. 290 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1980
Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. 288 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1980
Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. 288 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1980
Janzen v. Land O'Lakes, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1979
Janzen v. Land O'Lakes, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1979
Similarly, this court allowed “stacking” of no-fault basic economic loss benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.St.
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
Co., and need not be again considered.