Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co., 268 N.W.2d 913.

88 citing documents.

Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 621 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 2001
Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co. 613 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co. 613 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 582 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 1998
Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 582 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 1998
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 552 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1996
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Johnson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 551 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Johnson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 551 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bemboom v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bemboom v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Ins., , 916 n. 4 (Minn.1978).
Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 513 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1994
Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 513 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1994
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1992
The analysis of this court’s prohibition on “cross-priority stacking”
Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
g at a reduced-wage job); ( regarding the preemption of the dram shop field by the Civil Damages Act); ( regarding the stacking of priority level insurance coverage).
Meister v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 465 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Meister v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 465 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., ); and Kelsey v. State Farm Mut.
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., ); and Kelsey v. State Farm Mut.
Engel v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 455 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Engel v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 455 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Laffen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Laffen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 428 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1988
Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 428 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1988
Co., Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Mutual Ins.
Richardson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 424 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Richardson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 424 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lanners v. National Family Insurance Co. 424 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lanners v. National Family Insurance Co. 424 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
An injured person may “recover basic economic loss benefits under each no-fault coverage applicable to him as an insured to the extent of actual losses up to the stacked policy limits of all policies applicable on a single priority level.” (emphases added).
AMCO Insurance Co. v. Lang 420 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1988
AMCO Insurance Co. v. Lang 420 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1988
Co., (basic economic loss benefits stacked); Holman v. All Nation Ins.
Ryan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. 386 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ryan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. 386 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
stacking of basic economic loss benefits is limited to those coverages which (a) are applicable to the injured party as an insured, and (b) are on the same priority level.
Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 374 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1985
Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 374 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1985
Co., Continental claims Reed may not stack across priority levels.
Davidson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Bloomington 373 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Davidson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Bloomington 373 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 368 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 368 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Madden v. Home Insurance Company 367 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Madden v. Home Insurance Company 367 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
: *677 [W]e hold that under the present statute the injured person shall be allowed to recover basic economic loss benefits under each no-fault coverage applicable to him as an insured to the extent of actual losses up to the stacked policy limits of all policies applicable on a single priority level.
Kelsey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kelsey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
stated as follows: *798 [W]e hold that under the present statute the injured person shall be allowed to recover basic economic loss benefits under each no-fault coverage applicable to him as an insured to the extent of actual losses up to the stacked policy limits of all policies applicable on a sing
Hilden v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1985
Hilden v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1985
Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 356 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Reed v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 356 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
which appellant cited as authority, did not involve policies at different priority levels.