Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Faust v. Parrott, 270 N.W.2d 117.

31 citing documents.

City Market & Halal Meat, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A party may recover lost profits only if it shows that (1) the losses were a “direct result” of the other party’s actions and (2) “the amount of the reduction of profits may be ascertained with reasonable certainty.”
Absolute Sports Cards, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Richard Heggemeyer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(explaining that damages need not be “calculable with absolute precision” but “must nevertheless be ascertainable with reasonable exactness and may not be the product of benevolent speculation”).
Minn. 2019
be ascertainable with reasonable exactness and may not be the product of benevolent speculation.”
Claire Lee, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
be ascertainable with reasonable exactne ss and may not be the product of benevolent speculation.”
Negassi H. Ghebrehiwet v. Khaled Ghneim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Negassi H. Ghebrehiwet v. Khaled Ghneim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“While the law most certainly does not require that damages be calculable with absolute precision, damages must nevertheless be ascertainable with reasonable exactness and may not be the product of benevolent speculation.”
Gerald J. Hansen v. N'compass Solutions Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gerald J. Hansen v. N'compass Solutions Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Damages awarded for a breach of a noncompete covenant “are measured by the business loss suffered as a consequence of the breach.” d 117, 120 (Minn. 1978).
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
On the other hand, the supreme court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove lost profits by introducing evidence of lost sales but failing to introduce evidence of the “actual profit” they would have received.
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
As we have recognized, lost profits are an appropriate measure of damages “when the anticipated profits can be prove[n] to a reasonable, although not necessarily absolute, certainty.” N. Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125 , (requiring lost profits to be proven with “reasonable certainty” in the insurance context).
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
E.g., Hydra-Mac, d at 920 ; Polaris Indus, v. Plastics, Inc., Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
State v. Montanari 404 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Montanari 404 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Edling v. Stanford Township 381 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Edling v. Stanford Township 381 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Since no such itemization was presented, Ching Johnson argues the jury had no basis upon which to calculate its award, and damages were improperly the product of “benevolent speculation.”
Zobel & Dahl Construction v. Crotty 356 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1984
Zobel & Dahl Construction v. Crotty 356 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1984
Thomton, Sperry & Jensen, Ltd. v. Anderson 352 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thomton, Sperry & Jensen, Ltd. v. Anderson 352 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
whether the business was an unestablished one was never directly before us there, and no position toward this question was taken in the opinion.
B & Y Metal Painting, Inc. v. Ball 279 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1979
B & Y Metal Painting, Inc. v. Ball 279 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1979