Cited by

57 citing documents.

Curtis Oil v. City of North Branch 364 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 414-415 (quoting State, ).
Campion v. County of Wright 347 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Campion v. County of Wright 347 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“As a legislative act, a zoning or rezoning must be upheld unless opponents prove that the classification is unsupported by any rational basis related to promoting the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare.” State, by Rochester Assoc
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1984
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1984
Further, “[a]s a legislative act, a zoning or rezoning classification must be upheld unless opponents prove that the classification is unsupported by any rational basis related to promoting the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare, or that the classification amounts to a taking without compensation.”
Honn v. City of Coon Rapids 313 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1981
Honn v. City of Coon Rapids 313 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1981
The distinction between what is quasi-judicial and what is legislative is not always easy to make, but the argument that rezoning should be treated as quasi-judicial was made and lost in State