Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., 277 N.W.2d 648.

141 citing documents.

Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 467 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
at 439 (quoting Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., , 652-53 n. 3 (Minn.1979)).
Wolf v. State Farm Insurance Co. 450 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wolf v. State Farm Insurance Co. 450 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
However, the causal relationship or connection required between an injury and the use of a vehicle “need not be a proximate cause in the legal sense, it being sufficient that the injury is a natural and reasonable incident or consequence of the use of the vehicle.” Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Himle v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 445 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Himle v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 445 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(coverage allowed where positioning of vehicle in ditch next to downed power lines created a hazardous situation for a passenger walking toward the car, intending to use the vehicle for transportation purposes); (court found s
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 445 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 445 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Because the newspapers engaged in no independent tort, punitive damages are unavailable, see Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., and the trial court’s award of punitive damages must be set aside.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Levinson 438 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Levinson 438 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
the supreme court considered the meaning of “entering into” a vehicle within the context of Minnesota’s no-fault law.
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Goldenberg 435 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Goldenberg 435 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Strand v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Strand v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
It is enough if “the injury is a natural and reasonable incident or consequence of the use of the vehicle.” *270 ().
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission 428 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission 428 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 425 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 425 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(where the insured brought an action against the insurer to recover under the no-fault provisions of a motor vehicle insurance policy and also made a claim for damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress by nonpayment of claims and punitive damages).
Hanson v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hanson v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 422 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(quoting Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., ).
Huynh v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Huynh v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Haag-enson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., (“the finding that a person is entering a motor vehicle will not establish in every case that an injury has ‘arisen out of the use of a motor vehicle’ ”).
State Ex Rel. Woyke v. Tonka Corp. 420 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Woyke v. Tonka Corp. 420 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
at 439 (quoting Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., , 652 n. 3 (Minn.1979)).
R.L.B. Enterprises, Inc. v. Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
R.L.B. Enterprises, Inc. v. Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
[T]he type of actionable conduct referred to in the Restatement as “extreme and outrageous” must be “so atrocious that it passes the boundaries of decency and is utterly intolerable to the civilized community.” , 652 n. 3 (Minn.1979), citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 comment d (1965).
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., ).
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group 402 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group 402 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The statute clearly places the burden on a claimant to furnish the insurer with reasonable proof of loss, arid such proof is received “when an insured has given reasonable notice of a possible claim of right.” Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., ().
Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 399 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 399 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 117 (quoting Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., ).
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Klug 394 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Klug 394 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Saltou v. Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. 394 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Saltou v. Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. 394 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Company
Pikop v. Burlington Northern Railroad 390 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1986
Pikop v. Burlington Northern Railroad 390 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1986
at 1565 , but rather is premised on the tort-law principle that citizens of our state must be protected from conduct “so atrocious that it passes the boundaries of decency and is utterly intolerable to the civilized community.” , 652 n. 3 (Minn.1979) (citing the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, Comment d (1965)).
Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 384 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 384 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the plaintiffs contended that an insurance company’s refusal to pay claims constituted an independent tort for which they should receive punitive damages and damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 386 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1986
Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 386 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1986
7 Second, Minnesota common law, at least until now, follows the traditional rule that a bad faith breach of contract does not convert the breach of contract into a tort, Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., and, consequently, a first party insured cannot recover punitive damages in a breach of contract action against her insurer in the absence of some independent tort.
West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 384 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1986
West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 384 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1986
See Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc., -53 (Minn.1983); Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., Moore v. John E. Blomquist, Inc.
Hedlund v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 373 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedlund v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 373 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The causal connection is met if “the injury is a natural and reasonable incident or consequence of the use of the vehicle.”
Classified Insurance Corp. v. Vodinelich 368 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1985