Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Flynn v. Sawyer, 272 N.W.2d 904.

57 citing documents.

MTS CO. v. Taiga Corp. 365 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Murray v. Harvey Hansen-Lake Nokomis, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Murray v. Harvey Hansen-Lake Nokomis, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park 349 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1984
Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park 349 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1984
Additionally, parol evidence is admissible “when the written agreement is incomplete or ambiguous * *
Hield v. Thyberg 347 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1984
Hield v. Thyberg 347 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1984
Most recently, we stated that it was unclear if parol evidence was appropriate to prove that a written contract was signed to defraud or deceive a third party.