Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Johnson, 277 N.W.2d 208.

121 citing documents.

Marriage of Pekarek v. Pekarek 362 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In valuing assets, “it is only necessary that the value arrived at lies within a reasonable range of figures.”
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
and Druck v. Druck, 258 Minn. 114
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In exercising its function in applying the termination statute the court did not make, amend or change the statutory law {), but merely determined that the appellant had not made reasonable efforts to comply with duties imposed by common and statutory laws, and that therefore the statutorily defined remedial measures should be applied.
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 356 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 356 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
It has been stated that exactitude is not required in the valuation of assets, although the court’s figure must lie “within a reasonable range of figures.” Id.
In Re the Marriage of Helland v. Helland 354 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Helland v. Helland 354 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Ebnet v. Ebnet 347 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Ebnet v. Ebnet 347 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Exactitude is not required of the trial court in the valuation of assets...; it is only necessary that the value arrived at lies within a reasonable range of figures.”
Sharp v. Laubersheimer 347 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1984
Sharp v. Laubersheimer 347 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1984
In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'Brien 343 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1984
In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'Brien 343 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1984
Ronnkvist v. Ronnkvist 331 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1983
Ronnkvist v. Ronnkvist 331 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1983
we interpreted Minn.Stat.
Aaron v. Aaron 281 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1979
Aaron v. Aaron 281 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1979