Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Halverson v. Village of Deerwood, 322 N.W.2d 761.

59 citing documents.

All Around Property Preservation, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“It is the duty of the [district] court on remand to execute the mandate of [an appellate] court strictly according to its terms.”
In re the Estate of: Jose Antonio Chimborazò Quizhpi, decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“It is the duty of the trial court on remand to execute the mandate of this court strictly according to its terms.”
In re City of St. Paul’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Comm’n, (quotation omitted)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“On remand, a district court must ‘execute [a reviewing court’s] mandate strictly according to its terms’ and lacks power to ‘alter, amend, or modify [that] mandate.’” (alterations in original) (), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
All-American Ice L.L.C., DBA All-American Arena Products, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
15, 2017); d 761, 766 (Minn. 1982).
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that boundary by estoppel “requires knowing silence on the part of the party to be charged and unknowing detriment to the other” (quotation omitted) (emphasis added)); cf. Theros, d at 859 (observing that the adverse claimants “willingly paid for improvements on what they knew w
Colby Lake Fourth Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Franz J. Metzger, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(outlining the elements of public abandonment of a road).
County of Pope, Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
ble improvements such that “to reclaim the land would result in great damage to those in possession ”; an d (5) an “affirmative or unequivocal act of the municipality which, in view of all the circumstances, induced a third person reasonably to believe in and to rely upon such act as constituting a representation of an intent in fact to abandon the street.” (quotations omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. D. B., Juvenile Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Deerwood, (holding trial court must follow instructions on remand).
James A. Nilsson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven T. Meister, M. D., John Does v. Avera Marshall d/b/a Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center, John Roes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Steven T. Meister, M. D., John Does v. Avera Marshall d/b/a Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center, John Roes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Colleen M. Doyle v. Keith R. Klein Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Colleen M. Doyle v. Keith R. Klein Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Deerwood, and “[t]he [district] court may not vary the mandate .
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Mikell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Mikell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of Hennepin 830 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 2013
444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of Ramsey 830 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 2013
444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of Ramsey 830 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 2013
Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of Hennepin 830 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 2013
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 799 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 799 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
of Deerwood, -68 (Minn.1982) (holding that township was es-topped from denying that a boundary was established by practical location as a matter of law based on the elements applied on appeal without any additional equitable or discretionary consideration); SSM Invs.
Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP 704 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2005
Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP 704 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2005
of Deerwood, -67 (Minn.1982).
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
On remand, a district court must “execute [a reviewing court’s] mandate strictly according to its terms” and lacks power to “alter, amend, or modify [that] mandate.”
State v. Roman Nose 667 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2003
State v. Roman Nose 667 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2003
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 546 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1996
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 546 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1996
This court has defined the elements of abandonment of a
Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker 543 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Hecker v. Hecker 543 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(on remand, trial court must “execute [a reviewing court’s] mandate strictly according to its terms” and lacks power to “alter, amend, or modify [that] mandate”).
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 533 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1995