Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesota Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Mattson, 274 N.W.2d 116.

34 citing documents.

T & R Flooring, LLC v. Beverly J. O'Byrne, Eastwood Bank, Mac's Plumbing Service, Inc., Johnson Comfort Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
T & R Flooring, LLC v. Beverly J. O'Byrne, Eastwood Bank, Mac's Plumbing Service, Inc., Johnson Comfort Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
See Minn. Wood Specialties, (explaining that the service of the mechanic’s lien statement does not commence an action, but merely advises the property’s owner “of the extent of the hen”); Albert & Harlow Inc. v. Great N. Oil Co., 283 Minn. 246, 250 , (reasoning that the purpose of serving the mecha
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
‘Words and phrases which have acquired an established meaning by judicial construction are deemed to be used in the same sense in a subsequent statute relating to the same subject matter.” Minn. Wood Specialties, (stating that prior judicial efforts to define a term may guide a court’s interpretation of a statute).
State v. Gorman 546 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1996
State v. Gorman 546 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1996
(terms that have been judicially *9 defined should generally be used in the same sense in subsequent statutes involving the same subject matter).
State v. Robinson 539 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1995
State v. Robinson 539 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1995
See Minnesota Wood Specialties
Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL 507 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL 507 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
1352 (1937); Minnesota Wood Specialties, (“Words and phrases which have acquired an established meaning by judicial construction are deemed to be used in the same sense in a *872 subsequent statute relating to the same subject matter.”).
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See, e.g., Minnesota Wood Specialties, (since legislature did not define “owner” for purposes of the statute, the word must be held to include holders of a legal estate subject to a contract for deed).
McCarron's Building Center, Inc. v. Einertson 482 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McCarron's Building Center, Inc. v. Einertson 482 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minnesota Wood Specialties
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Minnesota Wood Specialties
Berks v. Oberpriller 448 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Berks v. Oberpriller 448 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Cf. Minnesota Wood Specialties, (no need to serve person who entered into contract where court finds valid service on a contract vendor and its conveyee).
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See e.g., United States v. Delahoussaye, 573 F.2d 910, 912-13 (5th Cir.1978); Minnesota Wood Specialities
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 415 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cox v. First National Bank of Aitkin 415 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Wood Specialties
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 415 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Barris 380 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Anderson 380 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Anderson 380 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
As we held in Barris , although a lien claimant is not required to serve all parties with an ownership interest in the property, see Minnesota Wood Specialties, the requirements of Minn.Stat.
Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Barris 380 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Minnesota Wood Specialties, the lien claimant served copies of the lien statement on the vendors of a contract for deed and not on the vendees.
R.B. Thompson, Jr. Lumber Co. v. Windsor Development Corp. 374 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
R.B. Thompson, Jr. Lumber Co. v. Windsor Development Corp. 374 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Minnesota Wood Specialties
Dolder v. Griffin 323 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1982
Dolder v. Griffin 323 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1982
Minnesota Wood Specialties, (Mattson), dealt with the question of who must be served, not with a prelien notice but with a mechanic’s lien statement.