Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hesse, 281 N.W.2d 491.

51 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(vacating second-degree criminal -sexual-conduct conviction under 609.04 because sexual intercourse “by definition involves not just penetration but also contact”).
State v. Johnson 616 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2000
State v. Johnson 616 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2000
(upholding convictions for first-degree criminal sexual conduct and incest for the same behavioral incident).
State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Larson 520 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
§ 609.04); (fondling was “incidental to the act of sexual penetration and not the kind of other sexual conduct which justifies a separate conviction in addition to that for the sexual intercourse”).
State v. Wilbur 445 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Wilbur 445 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Finally, J.P.’s statements to Deputy Fisher were admissible as corroborative evidence of the victim’s
Marshall v. State 395 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marshall v. State 395 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
such evidence is admissible for corroborative purposes where the victim of a sexual assault is present, under oath and subject to cross-examination.
State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hagen 391 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hagen 391 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Campa 390 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Campa 390 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Reynolds 386 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Reynolds 386 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Weaver 386 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Weaver 386 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Myers 359 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1984
State v. Myers 359 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1984
State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
State v. Cermak 350 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1984
State v. Haase 341 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1984
State v. Haase 341 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1984
(offense of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree and incest are different and neither is necessarily included in the other).
State v. Dudrey 330 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1983
State v. Dudrey 330 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1983
State v. Gardner 328 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1983
State v. Gardner 328 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1983
State v. Wrightington 323 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1982
State v. Wrightington 323 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1982
State v. Beeks 311 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1981
State v. Beeks 311 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1981
The leading Minnesota case dealing with admission of details of a complaint by the victim of a
State v. Harding 304 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1981
State v. Harding 304 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1981
torious contention is that the conviction for the lesser of the two offenses must be vacated pursuant to section 609.04, which, “bars convicting a defendant twice for the same offense (or of one offense and a necessarily included offense) on the basis of the same act.” The state, contends that the two acts of sexual penetration proved (anal and vaginal) were distinct, that neither was incidental to the other, and that therefore both convictions should be allowed to stand.
State v. Kruse 302 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1981
State v. Kruse 302 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1981
State v. Terry 295 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1980
State v. Terry 295 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1980
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Gatlin 295 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1980
State v. Gatlin 295 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1980
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
(incest requires proof of facts which criminal sexual conduct in the first degree does not and vice versa); (aggravated forgery-uttering requires proof of facts other than those required for theft by check and vice versa).
State v. Sanders 281 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1979