Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. Gatzke, 277 N.W.2d 11.

61 citing documents.

Eric Reetz, Minn. 2021
Club, Edgewater Motels, (“No hard and fast rule can be applied to resolve the ‘scope of employment’ inquiry.
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 757 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 757 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Edgewater Motels, (explaining that industry cannot be permitted to set its own standard of care); (holding that, to find negligence, jury need not find violation of federal motor-carrier regulation).
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The decision whether to grant JNOV is a question of law, Edgewater Motels, and we review questions of law de novo, Frost-Benco Elec.
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 657 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 657 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc. 637 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 2002
Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc. 637 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 2002
Snilsberg v. Lake Washington Club 614 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Snilsberg v. Lake Washington Club 614 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hentges v. Thomford 569 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hentges v. Thomford 569 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Edgewater Motels, see also McLaughlin v. Cloquet Tie & Post Co., 119 Minn. 454, 457 , 138 N.W.
County of Morrison v. Litke 558 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
County of Morrison v. Litke 558 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
“The granting of a judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict is a pure question of law.” Edgewater Motels
Bruchas v. Preventive Care, Inc. 553 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bruchas v. Preventive Care, Inc. 553 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
P.L. v. Aubert 527 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
P.L. v. Aubert 527 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Edgewater Motels, the supreme court held there was sufficient evidence to support a jury verdict that an employee was acting within the scope of employment when he negligently caused a fire at the plaintiffs hotel.
Boschee v. Duevel 530 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Boschee v. Duevel 530 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Huyen v. Driscoll 479 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
1071 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1177 (1991); Edgewater Motels
Diesen v. Hessburg 455 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1990
Diesen v. Hessburg 455 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1990
Anderson v. Lloyd's Feed Service 443 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Anderson v. Lloyd's Feed Service 443 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Southern Minnesota MacHinery Sales, Inc. 442 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Southern Minnesota MacHinery Sales, Inc. 442 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Edgewater Motels, (quoting Cofran v. Swanman, 225 Minn. 40, 42 , ).
Diesen v. Hessburg 437 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Diesen v. Hessburg 437 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 430 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 430 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mensing v. Rochester Cheese Express, Inc. 423 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mensing v. Rochester Cheese Express, Inc. 423 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Tesmer v. Rich Ladder Co. 380 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tesmer v. Rich Ladder Co. 380 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Edgewater Motels, -15 (Minn.1979) (in reviewing a JNOV appellate and trial courts must accept the view of the evidence most favorable to the verdict and admit every inference reasonably drawn from the evidence).
MacHo v. Mahowald 374 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MacHo v. Mahowald 374 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co. 372 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co. 372 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In reviewing a trial court’s decision to grant a JNOV, a review of the entire evidence is required, and an appellate court should apply the same standard as applied by the trial court, Edgewater Motels, since the granting of a JNOV is purely a question of law.
E.L.E.S.C.O. v. Northern States Power Co. 370 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
E.L.E.S.C.O. v. Northern States Power Co. 370 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Palatine National Bank of Palatine v. Olson 366 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1985