DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157.

239 citing documents.

  • State v. Shellito 594 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Aubid 591 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Martin 591 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Martin 591 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Aubid 591 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Miller 586 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Miller 586 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Scott 584 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Scott 584 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Lee 577 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Lee 577 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Edrozo 578 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Edrozo 578 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1998
    I. Critical impact In a pretrial appeal of an order suppressing evidence in a criminal case, we will reverse the determination of the trial court only “if the state demonstrates clearly and unequivocally that the trial court has erred in its judgment and that, unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.”
  • State v. Edrozo 567 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Edrozo 567 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. MacHholz 561 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. MacHholz 561 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Renneke 563 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Renneke 563 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    (original judicial statement of “critical impact” rule).
  • State v. Kahn 555 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Kahn 555 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Fiebke 554 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Fiebke 554 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Jude 554 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Jude 554 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    (state in pretrial appeal must show clearly and unequivocally that trial court erred).
  • State v. Pike 551 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Pike 551 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1996
    In an appeal of a pretrial ruling suppressing evidence, this court will only reverse the district court if the state demonstrates “clearly and unequivocally that the trial court has erred in its judgment and that, unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.” ().
  • State v. Paul 548 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Paul 548 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Pike 543 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Pike 543 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Roers 520 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Roers 520 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Jones 518 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Jones 518 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Plummer 511 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Plummer 511 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    In most instances the proper standard of review upon appeal by the state of a pretrial order in a criminal matter is to determine whether the state has demonstrated “clearly and unequivocally that the trial court has erred in its judgment and that, unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact *38 on the outcome of the trial.”
  • State v. Blacksten 507 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Blacksten 507 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Wold 506 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Wold 506 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Darnall 498 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Darnall 498 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    ANALYSIS When appealing a pretrial order suppressing evidence, the state must show that the district court’s judgment is “clearly and unequivocally” erroneous and that, without reversal, “the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.” , 159 *297 (Minn.1977).
  • State v. Tilleskjor 488 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Tilleskjor 488 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Blacksten 489 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1992