Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arundel v. Arundel, 281 N.W.2d 663.

77 citing documents.

Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 374 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Napier v. Napier 374 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Napier v. Napier 374 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
McClelland v. McClel *516 land
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“[I]n the exceptional case, the reasons which justify granting permanent alimony * * * also justify the securing of that alimony.”
Marriage of Kostelnik v. Kostelnik 367 N.W.2d 665 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Kostelnik v. Kostelnik 367 N.W.2d 665 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the husband’s pretax income was $107,000, while the spousal maintenance award was $1,000 per month.
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 367 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 367 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the court said: While it may be the trend in the law to provide alimony only so long as it is reasonably necessary for the once-dependent spouse to attain self-sufficiency, certain exceptional cases warrant an award of permanent alimony.
Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1984
Marriage of McClelland v. McClelland 359 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1984
Marriage of McClelland v. McClelland 359 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1984
we affirmed a permanent award after 29 years of marriage for a 51-year-old wife who had certain health problems and no vocational skills or independent resources.
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 356 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 356 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Witt v. Witt 350 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Witt v. Witt 350 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cf. O’Brien v. O’Brien, ().
In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'Brien 343 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1984
In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'Brien 343 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1984
“[I]n the exceptional case, the reasons which justify granting permanent alimony * * * also justify the securing of that alimony.”
Lillehei v. Lillehei 298 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1980
Lillehei v. Lillehei 298 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1980
Marriage of Otis v. Otis 299 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1980