Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc., 272 N.W.2d 262.

102 citing documents.

Trego v. Hennepin County Family Day Care Ass'n 409 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Trego v. Hennepin County Family Day Care Ass'n 409 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Tuckerman Optical Corp. v. Thoeny 407 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tuckerman Optical Corp. v. Thoeny 407 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Cavalier v. C. Machine Co. 404 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cavalier v. C. Machine Co. 404 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Monyoro v. Marriott Corp. 403 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Monyoro v. Marriott Corp. 403 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Tru-Stone Corp. v. Gutzkow 400 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tru-Stone Corp. v. Gutzkow 400 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1(1) (1984); Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips
Lange v. Lange Underground Construction, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lange v. Lange Underground Construction, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Simonson v. Thin Film Technology Corp. 392 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Simonson v. Thin Film Technology Corp. 392 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
McLane v. Casa De Esperanza 385 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McLane v. Casa De Esperanza 385 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Burke v. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Burke v. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Once it has been established that an employee has voluntarily quit, he has the burden of proving that his termination was with “good cause attributable to the employer.” Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Kraft v. Independent Delivery Service 376 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kraft v. Independent Delivery Service 376 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service 376 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance Service 376 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Midland Electric, Inc. v. Johnson 372 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Midland Electric, Inc. v. Johnson 372 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc.
Johnson Carpet & Commercial Services v. Nett 363 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson Carpet & Commercial Services v. Nett 363 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Martin Homes, Inc. v. Brown 361 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Martin Homes, Inc. v. Brown 361 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
We agree that the combined work pressures resulted in “unreasonable demands of employee that no one person could be expected to meet.” Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips
Kratochwill v. Los Primos 353 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kratochwill v. Los Primos 353 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries 349 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries 349 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips Inc.
Forsberg v. Depth of Field/Fabrics 347 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Forsberg v. Depth of Field/Fabrics 347 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Hollar v. Richard Manufacturing Co. 346 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hollar v. Richard Manufacturing Co. 346 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kahnke Bros., Inc. v. Darnall 346 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kahnke Bros., Inc. v. Darnall 346 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp. 345 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1984
Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp. 345 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter 345 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter 345 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Hanka v. Hardware 343 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hanka v. Hardware 343 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
If the employer is successful in going forward with this burden, the employee, to avoid disqualification from receiving unemployment compensation benefits, bears “the burden of establishing that he discontinued his employment for good cause attributable to the employer.” Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.
Salamon v. Time Share Computer Systems, Inc. 341 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Salamon v. Time Share Computer Systems, Inc. 341 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1983