Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Rugloski, 277 N.W.2d 385.

42 citing documents.

American Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Inc., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that “[l]ost profits may be recovered if they are a natural and proximate result of the breach and are proved with reasonable, although not absolute, certainty” and affirming an award of lost profits where the record included customer testimony and tax returns).
Abdiaziz H. Hirsi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Blue Cross maintains that this argument on timeliness was not presented to the district court, and therefore this court should not address it.
Swanny of Hugo, Inc., d/b/a Carpenter's Steak House v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Swanny of Hugo, Inc., d/b/a Carpenter's Steak House v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Integrity specifically maintains that the consequential-damages award is in error, and it rests on four arguments: contradicts the award; consequential damages were not reasonably foreseeable at 4 the time the parties entered the contract; Swanny failed to specifically plead consequential damages as required by Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 9.07; and the distr
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
supports an award of consequential damages in excess of the policy limit.
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., Wild v. Rarig, 302 Minn. 419, 440 , see William Lloyd Prosser, The Borderland of Tort and Contract, in Selected Topics On the Law of Torts 380, 426 (1953) (noting in contract actions, there is no recovery for mental suffering).
Osborne v. Chapman 574 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1998
Osborne v. Chapman 574 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1998
-88 (Minn.1979) (“When the insurer refuses to pay or unreasonably delays payment of an undisputed amount, it breaches the contract and is liable for the loss that naturally and proximately flows from the breach.”); cf. American Std.
Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 943 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Beaulieu v. Great Northern Ry.
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Murphy 474 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. v. Murphy 474 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 425 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 425 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
* * * The insurer is obligated to pay when the insured suffers a loss covered by the policy.” (citations omitted).
Lindquist v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lindquist v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Puthukulam v. Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis 413 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Puthukulam v. Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis 413 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
s v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 134 F.2d 766, 771 (8th Cir.1943) (payment of wages and expenses to former employee was not consideration for release of claim for wrongful discharge); (release was without consideration where truck was wrongfully repossessed and plaintiff had legal right to it at that time); (payment of an admitted liability does not provide consideration for compromise and settlement).
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. North Lakes Construction, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. North Lakes Construction, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(action by an insured against Ruglo- *370 ski and others for damages sustained when the insured’s coverage limits were not raised as requested and when payment of an undisputed amount was delayed).
Saltou v. Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. 394 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Saltou v. Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. 394 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“When the insurer refuses to pay or unreasonably delays payment of an undisputed amount, it breaches the contract and is liable for the loss that naturally and proximately flows from the breach.” -88 (Minn.1979).
Hay v. Dahle 386 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hay v. Dahle 386 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 381 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1986
O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 381 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1986
Borland v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 709 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Cornelius v. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. 354 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cornelius v. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. 354 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont 319 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1982
Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont 319 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1982
ship had been established, “[w]e have consistently held, in the absence of ■ specific statutory provision therefor, that extra-contract damages are not recoverable for breach of contract except in exceptional cases where the breach is accompanied by an independent tort.” Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., see, Moore v. John E. Blomquist, Inc., Wild v. Rarig, 302 Minn. 419 , cert.
Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'n 294 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1980
Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'n 294 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1980
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
See, Moore v. John E. Blomquist, Inc., Wild v. Rarig, 302 Minn. 419, 440 , certiorari denied, 424 U.S. 902 , 96 S.Ct.