Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, 283 N.W.2d 362.

90 citing documents.

Eric Berg, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Companies for the losses directly caused by the breach of fiduciary duty.” A party is entitled to a specif ic instruction on its theory of the case “if there is evidence to support the instruction and it is in accordance with applicable law.”
Phillip Musselman, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Tony Flattum, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hosp., (finding the opinion of a medical expert need only have a reasonable basis in fact to meet the standard for foundational reliability).
Stewart v. Koenig 767 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Stewart v. Koenig 767 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 614 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 2000
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 614 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 2000
‘Unless the evidence is practically conclusive against the verdict, [this court] will not set the verdict aside.’ ” () (other citations omitted).
H Window Co. v. Cascade Wood Products, Inc. 596 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
H Window Co. v. Cascade Wood Products, Inc. 596 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(stating party entitled to instruction on theory of case “ ‘if there is evidence to support the instruction and it is in accordance with applicable law’ ” ( (citation omitted))).
Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
Pouliot v. Fitzsimmons 582 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1998
‘Unless the evidence is practically- conclusive against the verdict, [this court] will not set the verdict aside.’ ” () (other citations omitted).
Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church 520 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church 520 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center 484 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McKay's Family Dodge v. Hardrives, Inc. 480 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McKay's Family Dodge v. Hardrives, Inc. 480 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
“Unless the evidence is practically conclusive against the verdict, we will not set the verdict aside.”
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 459 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 459 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1990
A party is entitled to a specific instruction on his theory of the case only “if there is evidence to support the instruction and it is in accordance with applicable law.” (citation omitted).
Apache Plaza, Ltd. v. Midwest Savings Ass'n 456 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 448 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 448 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Friesens, Inc. v. Larson 438 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Friesens, Inc. v. Larson 438 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
*448 , 368 n. 2 (Minn.1979) (citing Kroeger v. Lee, 270 Minn. 75, 78 , ).
Madsen v. Park Nicollet Medical Center 419 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Madsen v. Park Nicollet Medical Center 419 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Leonard v. Parrish 420 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Leonard v. Parrish 420 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Tuckner v. Chouinard 407 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tuckner v. Chouinard 407 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Estate of Lange 398 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Estate of Lange 398 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co. 395 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1986
Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co. 395 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 391 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 391 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1986
Appellants would have us rule: (a) that even if the “honest error in judgment” instruction correctly states the law applicable in certain circumstances, it was inapplicable here and, therefore, the trial court’s instruction was sufficient to convey a clear and correct understanding of the law to the jury (see Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, - ); and (b) that this court should follow a so-called “modern trend” of authorities excluding the “honest error” language from the physician liab
Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert Enterprises 384 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert Enterprises 384 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986