Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wulff v. Tax Court of Appeals, 288 N.W.2d 221.

30 citing documents.

Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County Minn. 2026
Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County Minn. 2026
Guardian Energy, LLC v. Cnty. of Waseca 927 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2019
Guardian Energy, LLC v. Cnty. of Waseca 927 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2019
Wulff v. Tax Court of Appeals , , 225 (Minn. 1979).
Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
Brayton v. Pawlenty 781 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2010
Riley v. Jankowski 713 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Riley v. Jankowski 713 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
the petitioners argued that the existence of the tax court as an independent agency of the executive branch of state government violated the separation-of-powers doctrine in article III, section 1, of the state constitution.
Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns 710 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 2006
Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns 710 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 2006
-25 (Minn.1979) (distinguishing the tax court from judicial courts and upholding the constitutionality of the tax court statute, as against claimed violation of separation of powers, on the grounds that the taxpayer has the opportunity to elect to proceed in district court and because the tax court decisions are s
State v. Baxter 686 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Baxter 686 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
The separation-of-powers doctrine is premised on the belief that “too much power in the hands of one governmental branch invites corruption and tyranny.”
Kmart Corp. v. County of Becker 639 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 2002
Kmart Corp. v. County of Becker 639 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 2002
4 In reaching this decision, we recognize that taxation is uniquely a function of the legislature, and the legislature has provided chapter 278 as the exclusive remedy for challenging the assessments upon which property taxes are based, Bethke v. County of *861 Brown, 301 Minn. 380, 385
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
As we have previously noted, the separation of powers doctrine “has roots deep in the history of Anglo-American political philosophy.”
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 588 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 588 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The supreme court later characterized these requirements as marking “the outside limit of allowable quasi-judicial power in Minnesota.”
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Finally, is cited in the concurring opinion as authority for the proposition that judicial review of quasi-judicial decisions is not constitutionally mandated.
Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(quoting Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409, 433 , ).
In Re the Occupational License of Haymes 444 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1989
In Re the Occupational License of Haymes 444 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1989
Quam v. State 391 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1986
Quam v. State 391 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1986
We so held in those cases because, "a strict interpretation of the separation of powers doctrine would make the existence and functioning of * * * agencies nearly impossible.” We also envisioned, in Wulff , however, "circumstances in which administrative adjudications could constitute an encroachment on the judicial power."
McCannel v. County of Hennepin 301 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1980
McCannel v. County of Hennepin 301 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1980
Although we have never addressed the issue of the scope of the tax court’s jurisdiction over constitutional questions, we upheld the constitutionality of establishing a tax court as the sole arbiter of disputes assigned to it, subject to review by this court