Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Krumm v. R. A. Nadeau Co., 276 N.W.2d 641.

50 citing documents.

Braylock v. Jesson 819 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2012
Braylock v. Jesson 819 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2012
-65 (Minn.1994); see also, (“A comparison of the language of the two versions demonstrates that the [amendment] was intended merely to clarify the [preexisting statute].”).
Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N 778 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2010
Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N 778 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2010
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Enlargement & Increasing the Number of Managers of the Brown's Creek Watershed District 633 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Enlargement & Increasing the Number of Managers of the Brown's Creek Watershed District 633 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
Lund v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 615 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lund v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 615 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Matter of Rate Appeals of Lyngblomsten Care Center 578 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Rate Appeals of Lyngblomsten Care Center 578 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Nadeau Co., see also Estate of Atkinson v. Minnesota Dept, of Human Servs., (citing Krumm).
Estate of Atkinson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 564 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1997
Estate of Atkinson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 564 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1997
Goodnature v. Mower County 558 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Goodnature v. Mower County 558 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Care Providers of Minnesota, Inc. v. Gomez 545 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Care Providers of Minnesota, Inc. v. Gomez 545 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Nadeau Co., (when meaning of governing-statute is doubtful, courts should give great weight to interpretation by department charged with its administration).
McAfee v. Department of Revenue 514 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
McAfee v. Department of Revenue 514 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Krumm v. R. A Nadeau Co., Soo Line R.R.
In Re the Joint Petition of Rochester Express Limousine Service, Inc. 508 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Joint Petition of Rochester Express Limousine Service, Inc. 508 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
A-Plus Demonstrations, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 494 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
A-Plus Demonstrations, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 494 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Nadeau Co., quoted in Holman, d at 238 .
Casper v. City of Stacy 473 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casper v. City of Stacy 473 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Nadeau Co., (courts presume “legislature does not intend an unreasonable result”); Minn.Stat.
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hall v. City of Champlin 450 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hall v. City of Champlin 450 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Langfield v. Department of Public Safety 449 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Langfield v. Department of Public Safety 449 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Nadeau Co., see also Goodman v. State, Department of Public Safety, (substantial consideration accorded to administrator's statutory interpretation).
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 442 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1989
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 442 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1989
Glencoe Area Health Center v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 441 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Glencoe Area Health Center v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 441 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 437 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1989
Possis Corp. v. Continental MacHines, Inc. 425 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Possis Corp. v. Continental MacHines, Inc. 425 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nadeau Co., Kellerman v. City of St.
In Re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n 408 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Activation of the Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n 408 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nadeau Co., see also Goodman v. State, Department of Public Safety, (substantial consideration accorded to administrator’s statutory interpretation).
Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 400 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 400 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Holman v. OLSTEN CORP., OLSTEN HEALTH CARE 389 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holman v. OLSTEN CORP., OLSTEN HEALTH CARE 389 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen 347 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1984
Nadeau Co., and in view of the well-established principle that the power to regulate includes the power to restrict or prohibit, United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 113 , 61 S.Ct.
Worm v. Waconia Farm Supply 282 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1979
Worm v. Waconia Farm Supply 282 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1979
where we held that the rate of compensation where the employee was entitled to maximum benefits was intended by the legislature to be adjusted by cumulatively adding the cost-of-living adjustment commencing retroactively to October 1, 1976, even though the employee’s work-related injury occurred on June 3