Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Linder, 268 N.W.2d 734.

127 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Edin Gaspar Cruz Flores AKA Marcelino Rivera Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Edin Gaspar Cruz Flores AKA Marcelino Rivera Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Fox 868 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Fox 868 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2015
State v. Morales-Mulato 744 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Morales-Mulato 744 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
maturity, intelligence, education, and experience; “the ability of the defendant to comprehend; the lack of or adequacy of warnings; the length and legality of the detention; the nature of the interrogation; whether the defendant was deprived of any physical needs; and whether the defendant was denied access to friends.” ().
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
State v. Farrah 735 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 2007
State v. Farrah 735 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 2007
citing Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 403 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Ganpat 732 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2007
State v. Ganpat 732 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2007
State v. Berkovitz 705 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 2005
State v. Berkovitz 705 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 2005
State v. Bailey 677 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2004
State v. Ray 659 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2003
State v. Ray 659 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2003
State v. Hannon 636 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
State v. Hannon 636 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
(quoting Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct.
State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
Jungbauer, d at 346 (-36 (Minn.1978)).
State v. Hendrickson 584 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hendrickson 584 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
State v. Givens 544 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1996
State v. Givens 544 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1996
See, e.g., State v. Kilburn, 304 Minn. 217, (jury trial); (Miranda rights); Minn. R.Crim.
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
State v. Champion 533 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1995
State v. Champion 533 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1995
we listed some of the factors to be considered in a totality-of-the-circumstances inquiry into the voluntariness of a confession.
State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
we listed the factors to be considered when making this inquiry.
State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
we reviewed standards for gauging voluntariness of a