Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hilton v. Nelsen, 283 N.W.2d 877.
- Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLC 797 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLC
797 N.W.2d 723
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Specific performance of a contract to convey real estate is not a matter of absolute right, and if enforcement would be unconscionable or inequitable, performance will not be decreed.” (quotation omitted).
- Dakota County HRA v. Blackwell 602 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1999
-
Dakota County HRA v. Blackwell
602 N.W.2d 243
Minn. 1999
See Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 134
- Petition of Geis 576 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Petition of Geis 576 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Young 476 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Young
476 N.W.2d 670
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Where the trial court’s findings of fact are “reasonably supported by the evidence, they are not clearly erroneous and must be affirmed.”
- City of St. Paul v. Various Items of Drug Paraphernalia 474 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
City of St. Paul v. Various Items of Drug Paraphernalia
474 N.W.2d 413
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Thus, where the findings of fact are “reasonably supported by the evidence, they are not clearly erroneous and must be affirmed.”
- Citizens State Bank of Hayfield v. Leth 450 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Citizens State Bank of Hayfield v. Leth 450 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Mechura v. McQuillan 419 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Mechura v. McQuillan 419 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Ferguson v. Shea 374 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Ferguson v. Shea 374 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Tourville v. Kowarsch 365 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Tourville v. Kowarsch 365 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Saliterman v. Bigos 352 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Saliterman v. Bigos 352 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Widgren v. Massie 352 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Widgren v. Massie
352 N.W.2d 420
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Interpreting this language, the Minnesota Supreme Court has held that “to overturn a trial court’s findings, [the] court must be left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made, notwithstanding the evidence to support such findings.” Cherne Industrial Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, (factual findings reasonably supported by the evidence are not clearly erroneous).