Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Sorlien, 299 N.W.2d 123.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. James Michael Thomson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Thomson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Troy K Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“If one is aware of a reasonable means of escape that does not present a danger of bodily or material harm, a restriction is not total and complete and does not constitute unlawful imprisonment.” (affirming a jury’s determination that a plaintiff’s “behavior constituted” consent to confinement).
Willow Run Partners, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See, n.1 (Minn. 1980) (declining to reverse judgment for defendant where plaintiff would be entitled to only nominal damages); Risk ex rel.
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
Jury instructions must “convey a clear and correct understanding of the law of the case as it relates to all the parties involved.”
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
1; (punitive damages appropriate if plaintiff proves defendant “acted willfully, wantonly and maliciously”), cer t. denied, 450 U.S. 1031 , 101 S.Ct.
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Roworth v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co., 674 F.2d 756, 758 (8th Cir.1982) (applying Minnesota law); -30 (Minn.1980), cert.
Leaon v. Washington County 397 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1986
Leaon v. Washington County 397 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1986
Yet, at least by designating a John Doe, the “[named] defendants are on notice that the complaint will be amended.”
Gits v. Norwest Bank Minneapolis 390 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gits v. Norwest Bank Minneapolis 390 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-30 (Minn.1980); Roworth v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co., 674 F.2d 756, 758 (8th Cir.1982).
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Gordon Employment, Inc. v. Jewell 356 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc. 356 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Gordon Employment, Inc. v. Jewell 356 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Stern and Gordon have not met their burden of proving that Jewell and Steiner acted “willfully, wantonly, and maliciously.”
LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp. 352 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp. 352 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dale v. Pushor, 246 Minn. 254
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
The trial court based its ruling to the contrary on an assumption that this court had “recognized” cert.