Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. City of Bemidji, 295 N.W.2d 555.

30 citing documents.

First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gerald L. Rehbein v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gerald L. Rehbein v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[M]arket value may be calculated on the highest and best use of the land.”
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In other words, Minnesota law requires that the assessments on the various properties be roughly proportionate to the benefits accruing to each as a result of the improvement.” (citation and quotation omitted).
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[M]arket value may be calculated on the highest and best use of the land.”
Prior Lake Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Prior Lake Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
city argues that the district court’s decision “focused on the present use of the property” in violation of Minnesota law, which “requires the court to value the property based on its highest and best use.” The city cites Anderson v. City of Bemidji, which states that “the market value may be calculated on the highest and best use of the 9 land.”
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of Winona 686 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of Winona 686 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Bisbee v. City of Fairmont 593 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bisbee v. City of Fairmont 593 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See, (calculating front-footage assessment based on cost of improvement); State v. Pillsbury, 82 Minn. 359, 372 , 85 N.W.
Buzick v. City of Blaine 505 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1993
Buzick v. City of Blaine 505 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1993
Anderson v. City of Bemidji
Buzick v. City of Blaine 491 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buzick v. City of Blaine 491 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The law requires only that assessments be “roughly proportionate to the benefits accruing.” (citing Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 97 , ).
DeSutter v. Township of Helena 489 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
DeSutter v. Township of Helena 489 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Countryside Village v. City of North Branch 430 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Countryside Village v. City of North Branch 430 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter 398 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter 398 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
at 203 ; , 561 n. 5 (Minn.1980); see Lydon v. City of North St.
Holden v. City of Eagan 393 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holden v. City of Eagan 393 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by