Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc., 281 N.W.2d 377.

30 citing documents.

Albany Ready Mix, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[A]n owner is not liable for work or materials furnished [to] a contractor when he is not a party to the contract between the contractor and the materialman.” Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc.
Tony�s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD 2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Tony�s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD 2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Johnson & Peterson, Inc. v. Toohey, 285 Minn. 181, 183-84, Duluth Lumber and Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc., 1 Property owned by a school district is exempt from mechanics’ liens under the common- law public policy exemption to the mechanic’s lien statute.
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Leaders, Inc., see also Hickman, d at 369-70 (stating that an intended beneficiary under a section 302 analysis has a contractual right to enforce a promise); Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc., -86 (Minn.1979) (applying incidental, intended beneficiary analysis).
Johnson v. Wright 682 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Johnson v. Wright 682 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Duluth Lumber Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc.
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(addressing waiver of governmental immunity provided for in the State Tort Claims Act); Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc., -84 (Minn.1979) (examining whether sovereign immunity was waived by the governing body of an Indian reservation by virtue of a “sue and be sued” clause contained in its housing ordinance); State ex rel.
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1996
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1996
Because this case involves non-Indian individuals and Indian tribal business entities and because it involves acts occurring both within Indian country and outside, it may be one of those cases where ‘“both the tribe and the State could fairly claim an interest in asserting [our] respective jurisdictions.’” , 382 n. 3 (Minn.1979) (quoting McClanahan v. Arizona Tax Comm’n, 411 U.S. 164, 179 , 93 S.Ct.
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
23, 26 (D.Minn.1974) (acknowledging tribes can confer immunity upon tribally-owned and -created corporations), aff'd, 517 F.2d 508 (8th Cir.1975); Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc., 383-84 (Minn.1979) (determining a tribally-ereated corporation fulfilling a governmental purpose was equivalent to the tribe, but lacked sovereign immunity because of an express waiver)-, see also Dixon v. Picopa Constr.
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 534 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gavle v. Little Six, Inc. 534 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Dev., Inc.
Klammer v. Lower Sioux Convenience Store 535 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Klammer v. Lower Sioux Convenience Store 535 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dacotah Properties—Richfield, Inc. v. Prairie Island Indian Community 520 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dacotah Properties—Richfield, Inc. v. Prairie Island Indian Community 520 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 874 F.2d 550, 552 (8th Cir.1989); see also Duluth Lumber & (presence of “sue and be sued” clause in ordinance creating housing authority constituted waiver); McCarthy & Assoc.
McCarthy & Associates v. Jackpot Junction Bingo Hall 490 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McCarthy & Associates v. Jackpot Junction Bingo Hall 490 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Duluth Lumber & see also Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 58 , 98 S.Ct.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 445 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 445 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc., -83 (Minn.1979) (holding state has compelling interest in applying its contract law to a civil dispute involving the Chippewa Tribe).
Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co. 755 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Skjod v. Hofstede 402 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Skjod v. Hofstede 402 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Duluth Lumber and Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc.
Tibbetts v. Leech Lake Reservation Business Committee 397 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1986
Tibbetts v. Leech Lake Reservation Business Committee 397 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1986
Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc.
Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by