Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Fossen, 282 N.W.2d 496.

33 citing documents.

State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Kraushaar 470 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1991
State v. Kraushaar 470 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1991
(defendant, on appeal, complained of trial court’s denial of request to see videotape re-enactment of dogs tracking defendant after murder because tape was shown for illustrative purposes only and was not in evidence; “not being in evidence, the jury cannot use it in its deliberations”); -09 (Minn.1979) (defendant, on appeal, complained of trial court’s not letting jury take taped statement to jury room; this court said that, under the rule, the trial court has discretion to preclude some exhibi
State v. McDonald 394 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McDonald 394 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Ture, d at 516 (Minn.1984) ().
State v. Larson 389 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1986
State v. Larson 389 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1986
511 n. 12 (Minn.1979) (quoting Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
511 n. 12 (Minn.1979) (quoting Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct.
Coralin v. State 377 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1985
Coralin v. State 377 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1985
State v. Larson 358 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1984
State v. Larson 358 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1984
State v. Eggert 358 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Eggert 358 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Muller 358 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Muller 358 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(quoting State v. Morgan, 290 Minn. 558, 561 , ).
State v. Parker 353 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1984
State v. Parker 353 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1984
State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
State v. Rachuy 349 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1984
State v. Rachuy 349 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1984
State v. Hatlestad 347 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Hatlestad 347 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The statement was deemed “accurate” but “inadvisable.”
State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
we stated that “[wjhether the prosecutor acted improperly in his final argument to the jury is largely a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Id.
Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 234
State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979
State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979