DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Adams, 295 N.W.2d 527.

137 citing documents.

  • State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (citing State v. Mathiasen, 267 Minn. 393 , ).
  • State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Henderson 394 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Henderson 394 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Rupp 393 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Rupp 393 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    (citing Mathiasen, 267 Minn. at 398-99 , d at 538 ).
  • State v. Scheu 392 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Scheu 392 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Although corroborating evidence need not establish a prima facie case of guilt, it must “link or connect the defendant with the crime.”
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lohmeier 390 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lohmeier 390 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Johnston 390 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Johnston 390 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Peirce 364 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Hayes 351 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Hayes 351 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Zeimet 348 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Zeimet 348 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1984
    because the underlying crime was arson in the third degree, Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Edwards 343 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1984
    indicating that if the underlying crime may be characterized as a felony, then it is appropriate to submit felony-murder but not death-in-the-commission-of-a-misdemeanor manslaughter.
  • State v. Kindem 338 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Kindem 338 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1983
    Moreover, supports the refusal to submit first-degree manslaughter in the commission of a crime.
  • State v. Boman 320 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Boman 320 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1982
    In refusing to resentence petitioner according to the Guidelines, the district court alluded to this court’s filed after the trial in this case, in which we held that where, as here, the underlying felony is a crime against the person, a lesser-included offense instruction on first-degree manslaughter under section 609.20(2) is not appropriate.
  • State v. Loebach 310 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
  • Distinguished State v. Loebach 310 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
    As a result of this court’s however, the prosecutor was not required to charge appellant with the lesser offense of first-degree manslaughter, and the trial court was not required to submit it.
  • State v. Nunn 297 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Nunn 297 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1980
    Recently, we held that if it is clear to the court that the underlying felony was a “felony upon or affecting the person,” then the court need only instruct on third-degree felony murder and need not also instruct on first-degree manslaughter in the commis- ■ sion of a crime, because the jury could not reasonably convic
  • State v. Morgan 296 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Morgan 296 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1980
    We recently held, filed June 27, 1980), that where it is clear the crime that accompanied the killing was a “felony upon or affecting the person,” the court need only instruct on third-degree felony murder and need not also instruct on first-degree manslaughter in the commission of a crime, because the jury could not reaso