Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Giddings v. State, 290 N.W.2d 595.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
    An accused person can waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, but the government bears the burden of proving that the person “understood that he had a right to have counsel present during an interrogation and that he intentionally relinquished or abandoned that known right.” (citing Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 404 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    State v. Renfrew, 280 Minn. 276, 280 , State v. Fossen, 312 Minn. 414, 423 , , 597 n. 3 (Minn.1980).
  • State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
    Subsequently, we have reiterated our disapproval of the practice “in the strongest of terms” in State v. Fossen, 312 Minn. 414 , , 597 n. 3 (Minn.1980), a case out of St.
  • State v. Ingold 450 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Ingold 450 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    1877, 1882 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972)
  • State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    1232, 1240 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)
  • State v. Johnson 403 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Johnson 403 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Nunn 351 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Nunn 351 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    597 n. 3 (Minn.1980); State v. Renfrew, 280 Minn. 276, 280
  • State v. Kivimaki 345 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Kivimaki 345 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1984
    1232, 1240 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)
  • State v. Phelps 328 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Phelps 328 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Sufka 295 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Sufka 295 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1980
    Recently, expressing our general disapproval of any interrogation, custodial or noncustodial, of any defendant whose sixth amendment right to counsel has attached, we reversed a conviction on the ground that the state had not shown that the petitioner there had waived his right to counsel and that, therefore, the d
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980