Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Giddings v. State, 290 N.W.2d 595.
- State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
-
State v. Clark
738 N.W.2d 316
Minn. 2007
An accused person can waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, but the government bears the burden of proving that the person “understood that he had a right to have counsel present during an interrogation and that he intentionally relinquished or abandoned that known right.” (citing Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 404 , 97 S.Ct.
- Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Finne v. State
648 N.W.2d 732
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Renfrew, 280 Minn. 276, 280 , State v. Fossen, 312 Minn. 414, 423 , , 597 n. 3 (Minn.1980).
- State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Lefthand
488 N.W.2d 799
Minn. 1992
Subsequently, we have reiterated our disapproval of the practice “in the strongest of terms” in State v. Fossen, 312 Minn. 414 , , 597 n. 3 (Minn.1980), a case out of St.
- State v. Ingold 450 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Ingold
450 N.W.2d 344
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
1877, 1882 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972)
- State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Torkelson
404 N.W.2d 352
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1232, 1240 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)
- State v. Johnson 403 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Johnson 403 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Heidelberger 353 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
- State v. Ture 353 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1984
- State v. Nunn 351 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Nunn
351 N.W.2d 16
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
597 n. 3 (Minn.1980); State v. Renfrew, 280 Minn. 276, 280
- State v. Kivimaki 345 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Kivimaki
345 N.W.2d 759
Minn. 1984
1232, 1240 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)
- State v. Phelps 328 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
- State v. Phelps 328 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
- State v. Sufka 295 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Sufka
295 N.W.2d 665
Minn. 1980
Recently, expressing our general disapproval of any interrogation, custodial or noncustodial, of any defendant whose sixth amendment right to counsel has attached, we reversed a conviction on the ground that the state had not shown that the petitioner there had waived his right to counsel and that, therefore, the d
- State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
- State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980