Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brouillette, 286 N.W.2d 702.
- State v. Mendoza 297 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Bauer
299 N.W.2d 493
Minn. 1980
citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct.
- State v. Burrows 295 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1980
- State v. Knight 295 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1980
- State v. Bettin 295 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1980
- State v. Burrows 295 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1980
- State v. Knight 295 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Bettin
295 N.W.2d 542
Minn. 1980
However, we do not basé our decision on this ground, where we upheld, as not a clear abuse of discretion, an order refusing to prohibit use of a prior sex conviction for impeachment purposes under circumstances similar to those in this case.
- State v. Graffice 294 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1980
- State v. Graffice 294 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1980
- State v. Leecy 294 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 1980
- State v. Leecy 294 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 1980