Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Robinson v. Lamott, 289 N.W.2d 60.

27 citing documents.

Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
1 (right of action for person who suffers loss “by an intoxicated person or by the intoxication of another person”)
Sommerness v. QUADNA RESORT SERVICES 416 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Larsen 405 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Larsen 405 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-63 (Minn.1979) (partially overruled on other grounds by Johnson v. Helary, Inc., ).
Johnson v. St. Charles Municipal Liquor Store 392 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. St. Charles Municipal Liquor Store 392 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
however, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the Civil Damages Act could not provide a basis for the intoxicated person to sue the person who provided the alcohol.
Herrly v. Muzik 374 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1985
Herrly v. Muzik 374 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1985
Johnson v. Kotval 369 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Kotval 369 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Trail, 298 Minn. 101, 104 , ).
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson v. Helary, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1984
Overruled Johnson v. Helary, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1984
the latter decision is overruled.
State v. Johnson 327 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1982
State v. Johnson 327 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1982
where we held that “although an alcoholic’s consumption of liquor may be involuntary in that he does not drink by choice, see, State v. Fearon, supra, his alcoholic consumption is nonetheless voluntary within the meaning of” cases which bar recovery under the Civil Damage Act to persons injured as a r
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Although one who voluntarily becomes intoxicated cannot recover for his own injury under the Dram Shop Act, see, e. g., Randall v. Village of Excelsior, 258 Minn. 81, 83 , a spouse may recover for loss of support under that act notwithstanding the injured party’s or decedent’s voluntary intoxication.
Hannah v. Jensen 298 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1980
Hannah v. Jensen 298 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1980
we ruled that the dram shop act is the exclusive remedy against liquor vendors and a common-law action is not available.