Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kochevar v. State, 281 N.W.2d 680.

116 citing documents.

State v. Schmit 601 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1999
State v. Schmit 601 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1999
State v. Garcia 582 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1998
State v. Garcia 582 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1998
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(recognizing factual findings of postconviction court will not be disturbed if supported by sufficient evidence).
State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
State v. Parsley 529 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1995
State v. Parsley 529 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1995
State v. Anderson 520 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Anderson 520 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Russell 503 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1993
State v. Russell 503 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1993
Dunn v. State 486 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1992
Dunn v. State 486 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1992
(When felony and homicide “are parts of one continuous transaction” the felony murder rule applies.).
State v. Nielsen 467 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1991
State v. Nielsen 467 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1991
In Minnesota the felony-murder rule applies whenever the felony and the homicide “are parts of one continuous transaction.” [ , 686-87 n. 4 (Minn.1979) ].
Reesman v. State 449 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Reesman v. State 449 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ramon v. State 416 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ramon v. State 416 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Kunshier 410 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Kunshier 410 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hernandez v. State 408 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hernandez v. State 408 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Propotnik, 299 Minn. at 58 , d at 638
Lallier v. State 403 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Ferraro 403 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lallier v. State 403 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Ferraro 403 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. French 402 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. French 402 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
687 n. 4 (Minn.1979) (“one continuous course of conduct”).
State v. McLAUGHLIN AND SCHULZ, INC. 397 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McLAUGHLIN AND SCHULZ, INC. 397 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Brodell v. State 393 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Brodell v. State 393 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
In Minnesota, we ascribe to the res gestae theory that the felony-murder rule is applicable where the “felony and the killing * * * are parts of one continuous transaction.”
State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
In Minnesota, the felony-murder rule is applicable where the “felony and the killing * * * are parts of one continuous transaction.”
State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Bryant 378 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Bryant 378 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Aarsvold 376 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985